Visit Killfile's column >>

KILLFILEHome Page

Epicurean Intelligentsia
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 305; Links Seeded: 7617
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/25/2009

US Taxes are Insane

advertisement

Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, "Taxes are the price we pay for living in a civilized society," but the tax system in the United States has long since abandoned any pretense of civility.

I don't begrudge the US government my money. Indeed, I consistently vote for candidates who aren't afraid to raise my taxes to solve the problems of our day; but the tax code has just gone too far. The US Tax Code consists of 6.9 Million words. Printed on standard printer paper, that represents 138 pounds of Tax Law.

Our taxes cover strange and highly specific eventualities with loopholes that require diligently laboring tax attorneys to even locate, let alone exploit. From renting tram cars to Dusseldorf to the inner workings of depreciation of assets, few Americans do their own taxes anymore, and fewer still understand them.

In large part, the ability for special interests to push major cuts, breaks, and loopholes through the Congress comes fro m the sheer complexity of the tax code. There's just no way to sum up the dry and dizzying complexities of a subtle change in offshore profit reporting in a thirty second newsbite. Without media attention there is almost no public reaction, and in the end our supposedly progressive tax code is written by those that have the most to gain from a regressive taxation system.

So what can we do about it?

First, the tax code needs to be simplified. Proposals like the Flat Tax, the Fair Tax, and others of its kind unfairly place the burden of taxation, either directly or through a subtle withholding procedure, upon the poorest of Americans. Ultimately, an income tax system need not be complex - we have just chosen to make ours that way.

First, we need to junk the entire tax code every 10 years. This would coincide nicely with the census, which would mean that percentages and tax brackets could be updated to reflect the changing realities of the American population. A tax code with a ten year lifespan would prevent the accumulation of complex structures and keep lawmakers accountable to tax payers for the tax loopholes and shelters that the law affords.

Secondly, we need to eliminate many of the annoying hassles that make Americans dread tax day so much. Simplification of forms would go a very long way to solving this problem - though a more innovative approach would be to adopt the software based solutions like Turbo Tax.

Food for thought: why can H&R Block grantee accurate results but the Federal Government can't provide me with a tax form I can accurately fill out on my own?

While we're addressing the issue of a user friendly tax system - submitting and paying taxes should be a bit less painful as well. E-filing is a nice touch, though about 10 years too late. For those still submitting on paper, why does the taxpayer have to pay postage to pay taxes?

With all the talk of smaller government and leaner budgets proposed by the Right (though less so these last five years) the continued growth and increasing obfuscation of the US tax code remains a baffling mystery.

Step up Republicans! Let's see some of that old-school Small Government Conservatism! With control of the House, Senate, and the White House - there's no reason real tax reform can't be enacted.

  • 44 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.2
0.5
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
{"commentId":48966,"authorDomain":"descom"}

Good to hear. I look forward to good discussion.

{"commentId":48966,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"descom"}
    Reply#51 - Sat Mar 4, 2006 2:50 PM EST
    {"commentId":48995,"authorDomain":"ctrain42"}

    Well, we'll get to see what life is going to be like without Social Security in a couple of decades if nothing is changed...

    {"commentId":48995,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"ctrain42"}
      Reply#52 - Sat Mar 4, 2006 3:36 PM EST
      {"commentId":49267,"authorDomain":"alaskan"}

      Michael Long writes:
      One note to alaskan, you mean the burden placed on business to track and collect taxes... like income and payroll taxes? I suspect if you eliminate one then the "burden" placing on collecting the other is negliable.

      Transaction taxes are more difficult and costly for small businesses than period taxes such as payroll or income.

      {"commentId":49267,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"alaskan"}
        Reply#53 - Sat Mar 4, 2006 9:37 PM EST
        {"commentId":49303,"authorDomain":"descom"}

        Transaction taxes are more difficult and costly for small businesses than period taxes such as payroll or income.

        Not if you tax based on what the company sold. If the tax rate is 25% and you sell $10,000 worth of goods or services then you owe $2,500. With the elimination of all other corporate taxes it becomes very simple. It's like a flat tax based on company income instead of personal income.

        {"commentId":49303,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"descom"}
          Reply#54 - Sat Mar 4, 2006 10:27 PM EST
          {"commentId":49396,"authorDomain":"scottfeldstein"}

          Corporations don't really pay any of federal income tax as it is. As I recall, 90%+ pay at a rate of 5% or less, and over half pay nothing at all. Just fyi.

          {"commentId":49396,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"scottfeldstein"}
            Reply#55 - Sun Mar 5, 2006 12:36 AM EST
            {"commentId":49403,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

            For those that want to continue the Fair Tax discussion, I've posted the aforementioned Fair Tax Critique. Fair Tax advocates in particular - I'd like your thoughts.

            {"commentId":49403,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"killfile"}
            • 2 votes
            Reply#56 - Sun Mar 5, 2006 12:47 AM EST
            {"commentId":50816,"authorDomain":"kai"}

            The Fair Tax has got to be the most misinterpreted system around. Please people, read the book before arguing against it. It takes into consideration and answers every argument against it that I've seen presented here, and solves them all.

            Well said. It really makes perfect sense if you just read the book.

            {"commentId":50816,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"kai"}
              Reply#57 - Mon Mar 6, 2006 11:43 AM EST
              {"commentId":55314,"authorDomain":"webquacks"}
              WebQuack StudiosDeleted
              {"commentId":55859,"authorDomain":"scottfeldstein"}

              And ruined the country's fiscal outlook to do it. Yay for tax cuts.

              {"commentId":55859,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"scottfeldstein"}
              • 1 vote
              Reply#59 - Thu Mar 9, 2006 7:31 PM EST
              {"commentId":1340169,"authorDomain":"LAUHAL63"}

              It's getting to be that time of year again!

              {"commentId":1340169,"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971","authorDomain":"LAUHAL63"}
              • 1 vote
              Reply#60 - Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:35 PM EST
              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
              {"canLink":false,"threadId":"2006","isPrivate":false}
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              {"threadId":"2006","contentId":"117971"}
              Start TrackingStart Tracking
              Stop TrackingStop Tracking