

Wanting for the attention of both Visitors and the Congress, the World War I memorial stands on the south side of the National Mall
Just off of Independence Avenue in Washington DC, nestled amidst a tall grove of holly trees, stands a small and unobtrusive marble structure. No signs mark its solemn grounds; and most tourists never see it standing in the shade and underbrush on their half mile trek from the expansive World War II memorial to the feet of Lincoln. The flagstones around its four foot marble base are cracked and broken with age and tall grass; and weeds now sprout from the crumbled mortar that once joined them into a modest platform.
Inscribed upon the monument are the 26,000 names of the men of the District of Columbia who gave their lives in "the Great War to Save Civilization." Today those names and the war they fought are all but forgotten - much as the woods and weeds have reclaimed much of this venerable monument.
The Washington DC World War One memorial is, in a very real sense, a causality of history. Constructed at the height of the Depression and dedicated in 1931, the memorial has now gone nearly thirty years without substantive attention. Long black water streaks have stained the marble columns and years of neglect have ground dirt and dust into the raised floor. Much like the memorial itself, the war it commemorates has faded from the minds of Americans. The few remaining veterans of the First World War are now well over 100 years old. Their sacrifices on the battlefields of France are all but forgotten and, like their memorial, glossed over in favor of more recent conflicts sharper and clearer in the American memory.
Despite its humble surroundings, the memorial was not always of such little renown. Designed by architect Frederick H. Brooke as a band stand, the memorial's dedication featured the President's Own United States Marine Band, directed by John Phillips Souza himself. It is, as the DC Preservation League says, "a gemstone in the crown of local Washington, D.C. memorial architecture and civic pride." Of all the structures on the Mall, the World War One memorial is the only one that commemorates the actions of DC residents specifically. It remains the only memorial within the District to mark The Great War and the last remnant of a portion of American history that is fast fading from our national memory.
As Congress appropriates millions for pet-projects like the now infamous "Bridge to Nowhere," the new car museum in Warren, Ohio, and other questionable applications of the tax payer's money from super-star architectural projects like Dallas' proposed suspension bridge to Vermont snowmobile trails, there must be left at least few dollars in the budget to remember the 26,000 souls who gave their lives for their country in a foreign land almost a century ago. Surely this "pro-war" Congress can find the time, money, and votes to remember the lives lost in the trenches of Verdun and the supreme sacrifice of a nation that lies beneath the fields of Flanders.
Surely they deserve at least that honor.
Killfile you just cant help yourself. Dont mention the war, especialy the first one. Toooo many skeletons here please just forget that America fought in WW1 exept the bit where they Won and saved the world.
American foly
How was any part of this war an American folly? The war was a European disaster. It was the tangled web treaties and agreements that escalated a minor incident into a horrible war.
In the early part of the century, America has an isolationist foreign policy. The country did not enter WWI until 1917 and only sent great numbers of troops in 1918 during the last months of the war.
At the war's onset , the USA was hardly a world superpower. The army was moderate sized and the navy was relatively small. The military buildup for the war created the boom that grew the US economy.
Its hard to say what the worst part of this conflict was for the USA but I think that the Straight out murder of black troops and Regular US troops by Insane leaders who sent troops into Machine gun fire even after the treaty was signed. The story of the last US service man to die is particularly pathetic and has been covered up. The Germans were shouting for them to stop but they were sent into no-mans land anyway to die on the 59th minute of the 10th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month 2 weeks after the war had all but finished and 10hrs after the treaty was signed. They knew it was signed and they sent men to die.
The Great War is maybe my favorite event in history. Never before had such complete bat@!$%# insanity infected so many people at the same time. It was indeed a war to save civilization - both sides were fighting for that. But civilization changed the minute the war started.
The best thing about it was that it was a historical accident - and since we know such things are possible we must wonder what we'll do if, in an era of nuclear weapons and unstable, religiously-devoted players, another such accident takes place.
Thanks for this article. The Great War must be remembered.
This war changed so much. Aside from all the treaties and alliances that caused the war to escalate so massively, the conclusion of the war set the stage for the remainder of the century.
The peace talks after the war set the stage for World War II. Perhaps if there was not such a clamor to make Germany pay huge reparations on top of the costs of the war, the Nazis would not have gotten the foothold they needed to launch into the next conflict. The way the world behaved after WWII showed that a lot was learned from the conclusion of WWI.
The peace talks also moved and created quite a number of borders. This is where many of the borders of the Middle East were created. The colonial possessions in Africa and Asia changed as German colonies and territories were divvied up.
"The League of Nations"
//shudders//
Hmmm I think there's an org. in this day and age that's about as ineffective as the LoN... what is it? damn it was right on the tip of my tongue...... oh yea, the United Nations
I am not sure that this is even possible, but I believe that the League of Nations was even less effective that the UN.
name a few?
..Darfur,Somlia,Hatia,Etiopia dang most of the entire continent..oops sorry my bad Drew...carry on...Killfile ....sorry I wish I shared your view of the UN,but I don`t .The idea yes but presently this institution is a waste of space..
Those would be failings of the security council at the hands of the US Rob... The humanitarian activities of the UN are great successes and could not be accomplished with out the UN.
Those would be failings of the security council at the hands of the US
Absolute B.S. Back up your claims there buddy.
The humanitarian activities of the UN are great successes and could not be accomplished with out the UN.
Once again, name some.
Andrew Benton If the UN is Flawed then the USA can only be worse as the UN was created by the USA on principles enshrined in your constitution.
Obviously I agree with you that the USA constitution is a very poorly written document..
Killfile,
Good article. IT is very sad that they have forgotten those who sacrificed their lives to end the insanity in Europe.
I wonder how the world would look today had we not joined the conflict. Perhaps the Soviets would have been able to take over all of Europe in the 20s since the remainder of the nations would be in a highly weakened state and the USSR had been rebuilding for quite some time. That would have causes us some problems to be sure.
This makes me wonder how Wilson would feel if he knew that his greatest moment (in his view) is being ignored into dust.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |