Visit Killfile's column >>

KILLFILEHome Page

Epicurean Intelligentsia
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 303; Links Seeded: 7536
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/06/2009

Above The Law: What If You Could Buy A Country?

(Intellectual) Piracy Returns To The High Seas?

Photo by Jan Tik. (License: Creative Commons Attribution)

advertisement

You probably haven't thought about it, but chances are that you're intimately familiar with one of the most crucial and defining issues of international trade in the 21st Century. If you've ever downloaded a video game over BitTorrent, pirated an MP3 from Napster, or snagged a movie off of Kazaa you've broken international copyright law. While the music and film industries are frantically trying to stop people like you from getting their content for free, their lobbyists are leaning hard on the United States Government and other Western powers to tighten the enforcement of copyright laws around the world.

It's this issue that's at the heart of the negotiations between the various factions and alliances in the World Trade Organization. Developing1 countries, like China, India, Brazil, and South Africa2 want the United States and Europe to stop subsidizing agriculture. They reason that, absent these subsidies, the higher cost of agricultural production in the United States and Europe will give a comparative3 edge to farmers and agribusinesses based in the developing world. In exchange, the United States and Europe want a crack-down on pirated drugs, movies, software, music, and other "intellectual properties."

But the talks are stalled; and from the looks of things, the Doha Development Round of the World Trade Organization, where all of this was being debated, is going nowhere fast. Though the complexities of international trade negotiations are daunting, the reason Doha is stalled couldn't be simpler: not everyone likes the deal.

Though it is the Western Agribusinesses, with so much to loose in Governmental subsidies, that are largely to blame for the derailing of the talks, another far less influential group has taken notice and is moving to protect its interests: Pirates.

More specifically, Western Intellectual Property Pirates - the likes of which are responsible, not for the majority of the pirated movies, music, and software sold every day, but the majority given away for free, every hour of every day, online. Globalization4 and Liberalization5 are changing the world and lowering trade barriers; and as it does so the peculiar confluences of I.T. infrastructure and lax I.P. laws that give rise to websites like The Pirate Bay and grey-market enterprises like AllOfMp3.com are becoming increasingly scarce. Countries like Russia and even Sweden, once havens from the strict I.P. laws of the United States and Europe are coming under increasing pressure to conform to stricter standards or face the consequences of exclusion from the World Trade Organization.

With fewer and fewer countries receptive to the legal ambiguities of their activities, Internet Pirates are asking themselves a curious question, and one that has some troubling implications for the established order of international trade.

What if you could buy a country?

The notion itself throws a wrench into the workings of the international trade system. Corporations exist, either independent of sovereign countries or within them; they do not, as a rule, own them outright. Yet just such a possibility presents itself in the form a little known Ocean Defence Platform off the coast of Britain called - appropriately -Sealand.

The Principality of Sealand is a man-made off-shore installation named HM Fort Roughs, a former Maunsell Sea Fort located in the North Sea 10 kilometers (six miles) off the coast of Suffolk, England, as well as territorial waters in a twelve-nautical-mile radius.6 Constructed during the Second World War as a permanent guard-post for the Port of Harwich , the structure, then called HM Fort Roughs was abandoned by the British government after the cessation of hostilities. Roy Bates took control of the fort in 1967 with the intent of using it to broadcast an illegal radio signal into the United Kingdom and, after fighting off the Royal Navy, received a British Court ruling which abdicated British claims to the station.

Free of any existing government, Mr Bates declared the Principality of Sealand as a Constitutional Monarchy, commissioned a flag, and issues currency and passports. Though Sealand's sovereignty is challenged by the United States and Germany, the Principality continues to claim the privilege based upon its location in international waters at the time of its declaration, its interactions with the United States and Germany, and the aforementioned British Court decision.

And today that sovereignty7 is up for sale.

Admittedly the asking price is steep, 750,000,000 €, but the implications are staggering. The ownership of a sovereign nation would place the entities that exist there outside of the reach of any other government. It is that immunity that The Pirate Bay, one of the highest profile BitTorrent trackers on the Internet, wants to purchase. Should the deal go through, The Pirate Bay would constitute at once a corporation and the de facto government of a sovereign nation-state -- a sort of rogue state in the system of international trade.

Outside of the reach of any other national government, the Pirate Bay would have little to fear save for the possibility of military conquest. While Sealand's defenses are sufficient to ward off even the most curious of explorers, they pale in comparison to the bristling armaments of the United States Navy. Military action against Sealand caries with it, however, the most curious of complications. If Sealand is unrecognized by the offending power, any attacks would be targeted against the territory of the United Kingdom. If recognized by the offending power, war would require an appropriate casus belli and would, moreover, constitute a declaration of war against both a sovereign nation and a corporation.

Regardless, Sealand remains as it has been for the last forty years: outside of the reach of the world's governments and just off the shore of England, home to pirates and informational-anarchists, a haven of libertarianism in the grey waters of the North Sea.

Can you buy sovereignty? Who knows, the idea might just be crazy enough to work.

  • 44 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
8.7
4.8
1.0
{"commentId":476400,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

Just to be clear, I'm in no way advocating any illegal actions in the writing of this article. I'm not suggesting that you use BitTorrent to get illegal or pre-release copies of copywritten works or that you visit sites like ThePirateBay or AllOfMp3 if the laws of your particular nation would prevent you from doing so.

I'm simply exploring the significance of world events.

{"commentId":476400,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"killfile"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:31 AM EST
{"commentId":476429,"authorDomain":"psi29a"}

Yar!

Right, so they buy an island and establish their own government. So the EU, USA, and basically the WTO will then pressure the providers of Internet access that goto Sealand to cease doing so. We easily avoided a war, and let market forces do their job.

The other way to look at it is to have the RIAA and the MPAA hire out any one of a numerous security contractors (aka Mercs) to destroy the pylons and thermite the structure. No deceleration of war needed, and it isn't like the other nations would care. Sealand isn't apart of the UN and is unlikely to be apart of any group.

{"commentId":476429,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"psi29a"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:50 AM EST
{"commentId":478034,"authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}

The other way to look at it is to have the RIAA and the MPAA hire out any one of a numerous security contractors (aka Mercs) to destroy the pylons and thermite the structure. No deceleration of war needed, and it isn't like the other nations would care. Sealand isn't apart of the UN and is unlikely to be apart of any group.

Anybody beside me think this would make a good Sci-fi story.

{"commentId":478034,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:21 AM EST
{"commentId":478138,"authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}

I do, I think this would make a killer movie, or maybe even a season-long series.

{"commentId":478138,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}
    #1.3 - Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:03 AM EST
    {"commentId":478145,"authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}

    The RIAA and MPAA would hire a ninja mastermind to take down the pirates. Ninjas vs Pirates - it would be the greatest blockbuster of all time.

    {"commentId":478145,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.4 - Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:08 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":476627,"authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}

    There are two ways of becoming a country: Declare and be recognized by other countries. Just declare that you're a free nation and that's it. These days the first one is acceptable and according to THAT rule Sealand is not a nation. A court in Germany ruled that for a principality to be recognized as a region it must have dry land. Sealand doesn't.

    Moreover, Sealand is just a bite-sized oil-rig like structure on a sand bank. US doesn't have to strike Sealand. One cruise missile from the UK and it's done for. Yeah, I accept. Things are not that easy but such a place as Sealand must not be seen as a Haven. Ironically there was a Haven Co. operating from Sealand, which suggested that they'd store any data barring terrorism and child porn. They were featured in dozens of magazines, internet sites etc.

    Anyway Sealand's ¨official¨ site says that offers of 8 digits and up for the place would be considered. 750 million may be an overestimation as I saw a few days ago that the price they were asking was 560 million. I don't believe any site, not even piratebay.org can raise that kind of a money.

    I believe these late events are exceptionally funny. Pirate bay actually does want to buy sealand as their site buysealand.com suggests. What are they going to do with that rusty chunk of iron? I'm not an expert on the subject but I believe there's sufficient technology in their opponent's hands to prevent them from accessing the internet. Fiberoptic lines can be found and severed by remotely operated vehicles. Sattellite connection can be impaired electronically. So, of what use can such a place be?

    {"commentId":476627,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:40 PM EST
    {"commentId":476632,"authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}

    BTW current fundraiser status on buysealand.com is at 15000 bucks. :)

    {"commentId":476632,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:42 PM EST
    {"commentId":476675,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

    They probably won't raise enough money to buy the place, but the publicity alone will probably give them an in as far as service goes.

    But it makes for an interesting mental exercise. All it takes is one country with enough "screw you" money to hold out and the entire I.P. house of cards comes down.

    Active attempts to jam their internet access present another problem, but one that I wouldn't worry too much about, particularly if they've got other hosts there. If it's Pirate Bay alone out there you're right - they're in trouble. But if you're talking about a major data haven with a hands off policy and iron clad security there's going to be real consequences if a take-down is attempted.

    {"commentId":476675,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"killfile"}
    • 3 votes
    #2.2 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:09 PM EST
    {"commentId":476801,"authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}

    I believe there would be only Piratebay on the island if the takeover happens. There's very limited area on the platform and Piratebay is huge.

    I'm very curious, how would the cyber war between inhabitants of the platform and opposing countries? What can be the consequences for the aggressors?

    {"commentId":476801,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}
      #2.3 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:17 PM EST
      {"commentId":476819,"authorDomain":"suleymanhabib"}
      S.HabibDeleted
      {"commentId":476828,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

      The Pirate Bay doesn't have to be huge. If they wanted to the entire system could be run off a server the size of a few small cars. Bigger just means less expensive. Sealand has more than enough space for some very high end server farms.

      {"commentId":476828,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"killfile"}
      • 1 vote
      #2.5 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:27 PM EST
      {"commentId":476835,"authorDomain":"killfile"}
      KillfileDeleted
      Reply
      {"commentId":476680,"authorDomain":"reddestiny"}

      I fully support an invasion of Sealand to liberate its people and end their state-sponsored cyber-terrorism. The gift of democracy will encourage democratic-socialist countries throughout the European Union to make the switch to pure democracy and overthrow their unpopular, wimpy leaders.

      On a more serious note: This was a man-made country. What happens when even larger man-made islands spring up in international waters and claim sovereignty? What if they have navies to protect them? What if their entire economies are run by renting out immunity to international law to corporations?

      If Sealand is successful, it will be emulated, with possibly serious consequences.

      {"commentId":476680,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"reddestiny"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#3 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:11 PM EST
      {"commentId":476712,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

      Even if it isn't, a ship at sea enjoys a number of immunities and privileges which make the politics very interesting. In international waters, it's not really under anyone's jurisdiction. Sure a Navy could get involved, but baring that, there is little anyone can do. Sealand is handy because it's a fixed location and that makes data easier to acquire - but that doesn't mean that a free-floating ship couldn't fill the same role.

      {"commentId":476712,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"killfile"}
      • 1 vote
      #3.1 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:28 PM EST
      {"commentId":476732,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

      Even if it isn't, a ship at sea enjoys a number of immunities and privileges which make the politics very interesting. In international waters, it's not really under anyone's jurisdiction.

      Those immunities are limited. It is still illegal to actually pirate other ships or to hunt endangered animals such as certain whales.

      {"commentId":476732,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
      • 2 votes
      #3.2 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:39 PM EST
      {"commentId":476773,"authorDomain":"pody"}

      On a more serious note: This was a man-made country. What happens when even larger man-made islands spring up in international waters and claim sovereignty? What if they have navies to protect them? What if their entire economies are run by renting out immunity to international law to corporations?

      If Sealand is successful, it will be emulated, with possibly serious consequences.

      Actually, it can't be emulated, even though Sealand is recognized by the UK. Sealand was established in 1967. in 1982, the UN said that henceforth no man-made islands could be considered sovereign-- this, of course, after Sealand was considered sovereign by the UK, and was "grandfathered" in. From Wikipedia:

      According to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, there is no transitional law and no possibility to consent to the existence of a construction which was previously approved or built by a neighbouring state. This means that artificial islands may no longer be constructed and then claimed as sovereign states, or as state territories, for the purposes of extension of an exclusive economic zone or of territorial waters.

      The only prospect for successful assertion of sovereignty would be to show that there was de facto sovereignty prior to 1982.

      {"commentId":476773,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"pody"}
      • 5 votes
      #3.3 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:01 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":476691,"authorDomain":"tschreck"}

      the distributed nature of the internet dictates that in reality there is no need to host servers on sealand.

      the idea that it might be able to have its own internet domain might well be enough. the servers can actually be hosted anywhere, so perhaps just the .sl (or whatever the designation would be) name servers would be enough.

      just a thought..

      {"commentId":476691,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"tschreck"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#4 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:19 PM EST
      {"commentId":476736,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

      The distributed nature of the Internet is vastly overrated. The Internet is not just one giant web over the world. There are actually a very limited number of data cables that share connections between nations and even fewer between nations. If you control these bottlenecks then you control the Internet.

      Besides, if you are hosting illegal material the top level domain means absolutely nothing, though I doubt Sealand even has one, it is where the material is actually hosted that matters. For example, hosting material in Germany with a Sealand top level domain still leaves all the data under the jurisdiction of German laws.

      {"commentId":476736,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
      • 3 votes
      #4.1 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:42 PM EST
      {"commentId":476762,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

      They're talking about hosting on Sealand but that leaves open other choke-points. The best shield from that would be to have other high-security and high-profile content hosted there as well.

      Sealand works as a datahaven for the same reason Alcatraz worked as a prison.

      {"commentId":476762,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"killfile"}
      • 1 vote
      #4.2 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:57 PM EST
      {"commentId":476768,"authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}

      Servers have to be somewhere. Any place with a good internet connection for the servers will probably also have national police who will come raid the servers given a good enough reason, as the Pirate Bay found out the hard way.

      {"commentId":476768,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
      • 1 vote
      #4.3 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:59 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":476779,"authorDomain":"kirag"}

      Very interesting question. What is a country? Also while this case might not be one that actually has some effect, just the idea... pirate bay may not have the money needed, but many other companies do. What if Mc Donnals whated to buy a country, or some even larger company? Some of these companies do have the money.

      {"commentId":476779,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"kirag"}
        Reply#5 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:03 PM EST
        {"commentId":476878,"authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}

        I have always been disappointed that Bill Gates didn't buy a country and start building a robot army :(

        {"commentId":476878,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
        • 5 votes
        #5.1 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:58 PM EST
        {"commentId":476901,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

        Any self respecting geek... right?

        {"commentId":476901,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"killfile"}
        • 3 votes
        #5.2 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:13 PM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":477060,"authorDomain":"RumWalker"}

        It would be a risky investment to purchase Sealand. What if a country such as Britain made a barricade around Sealand? It's inhabiter's would have to surrender some time.

        The question is: would you be able to keep other nations at bay, and make up the money you used to buy Sealand, plus a profit, all the while not getting killed?

        If Sealand was a recognized nation, then if I were Tony Blair I'd take over Sealand to expand my territorially waters. :D

        {"commentId":477060,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"RumWalker"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#6 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:50 PM EST
        {"commentId":477190,"authorDomain":"Henryvii"}

        Long before Sealand were put on the market, I have considered the possibility of buying sovereignty from an island nation - and using it to set up not an intellectual property haven, but a truly free country. Would it be possible, perhaps, to purchase and uninhabited island or ten from Indonesia - and develop it/them into a major world player in international politics, or at least a place to escape the idiocy that can be found in many places throughout the world?

        I'm sure there are some countries where selling unused land would be a very viable option for raising funds. The Louisiana Purchase and the purchase of Alaska went through successfully, after all.

        {"commentId":477190,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"Henryvii"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#7 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:16 PM EST
        {"commentId":477950,"authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}

        I've also pondered this, but have come to an opposite conclusion on what it would mean. It would not be a truly free country - under most modern systems the country 'owns' the land, but individuals can 'own' pieces of it too. Even if you buy your property, however, there is some basis under which the country owns it too. A house bought in England remains under English sovereignty, and can be taken away from the individual owner according to certain laws of the land.

        If the uberOwner is now a corporation, not a nation state, could individuals still 'own' a house, for instance. Could they own a company within that country, or would all houses, companies etc belong to the corporation state? If so, isn't that more a communist-dictatorship than a truly free country? What of the people who live there - are they citizens of a country, employees of a corporation, or what? Are they now 'owned' by the state?

        I suspect that the time will come when a small country with little infrastructure will find it irresistible, and will sell to a corporation. This will probably be a country rich in untapped minerals sold to a mining company (de Beers, AngloGold etc) or with high agricultural possibilities sold to big agribusiness (Monsanto or the like). After all, once the megacorporations have merged and acquired and are still making massive profits, what are they to do with their cashflow? Without something enormous to spend the money on, the profits essentially become meaningless. At this point the specifics will be worked out, and a truly brave, truly new world will be born. Only time will tell if it's truly a mistake.

        {"commentId":477950,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}
        • 1 vote
        #7.1 - Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:21 AM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":477216,"authorDomain":"crocus"}

        The question that lies beneath that is indeed quite interesting. Considering production capacities in the Developed World (i.e. USA, EU, Japan, Australia) being relocated to Developing countries... (here my english crumbles...)

        I always thought that in the World of the future, China and India would produce. Europa and the US would think (meaning producing scientific knowledge bases on patents, and 'creative' products like copyrighted works of art). And the rest of the poor countries would do agriculture. (That's rough, I know. But I think you can guess what I mean).

        But what if that trade doesn't work, because all sorts of free knowledge and the erosion of patent and copyright laws will make the Developing and Undeveloped world unwilling to trade.

        {"commentId":477216,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"crocus"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#8 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:28 PM EST
        {"commentId":477642,"authorDomain":"seamusmccaffrey"}

        Just the history of Sealand fascinates me. To me, Bates is a crackpot, afterall, he purchased a national soccer team and minigolf team. I'm going to go to some remote island in the South Pacific and call myself Prince, just like Roy. According to courts in U.S. and Germany, Sealand is a part of the UK, afterall mail to Sealand is sent to a UK address and the Bates family likes on the mainland. Sealand is just as much it's own country as my bedroom, therefore any shady company that harbors itself there is still under the jurisdiction of the UK.

        {"commentId":477642,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"seamusmccaffrey"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#9 - Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:27 PM EST
        {"commentId":478867,"authorDomain":"Scripturient"}

        Plenty of space in Australia:
        www.atlantium.org

        For another angle on declaring independence have a look at the article 'The Birth of a Queer Nation' on www.superdrewby.com

        {"commentId":478867,"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926","authorDomain":"Scripturient"}
          Reply#10 - Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:26 PM EST
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"68210","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"68210","contentId":"520926"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking