
First, a note of apology to my regular readers. Newsvine is undertaking a project with NewAssignment.Net and Wired News called "Assignment Zero." The project will be an experiment in crowdsourcing and will focus, appropriately, on crowdsourcing itself. It's new, it's edgy, and it's something that the Newsvine community is very excited about. As one of Newsvine's most visible columnists I've been asked to serve as a point of contact between NewAssignment.Net and the Newsvine community.
Thus, this article is neither news nor opinion in the traditional sense, but rather a view into the crafting of media itself - or perhaps one way in which the media is crafted, and may be crafted in years to come.
It has been said that "many hands make lite work" and though this adage Assignment Zero will attempt a view into the inner workings of the crowdsource movement at a scope and scale orders of magnitude beyond what a traditional team of journalists could accomplish. Where traditional blogs and Newsvine focus on the musings and research of the individual, NewAssignment operates as a collective, assigning, coordinating, collaborating, and reviewing to create an ad-hoc news team. If everything goes according to plan, the result will be a virtual news room complete with researches and writers scattered over the globe all cooperating to distill magazine quality journalism from the legions of amateurs and hobbyists that fuel social networks and news.
Assignment Zero is a whole new take on social media. Traditionally, social media is narcissistic. Newsvine is no exception to this rule; but narcissism does not encourage consistent collaborative results. Assignment Zero's approach is radically different - rather than showcasing the individual, Assignment Zero showcases the community. In true journalistic fashion, research comes before writing and writers are chosen - hand picked in fact - for the features they pen. It's antiquated, traditional, and a breath of fresh air in the social news community.
In a bit of social experimentation, Newsvine has been allocated three complimentary stories on Assignment Zero which shall be elaborated upon shortly. Authors seeking to contribute will find a series of ongoing projects provided by Assignment Zero's "assignment desk" ranging from collaborative research (Tell us about "A Million Penguins") to the daunting task of writing the final story on the topic at hand (Write the story). Icons distinguish collaborative projects from those best suited to solo work and Assignment Zero's software helps keep the entire endeavour running smoothly.
Assignment Zero's editors have assigned Newsvine three projects focusing on specific aspects of the broader story. Specifically, Newsvine authors will focus on Crowdsourced Novels, Crowdsourced Nonfiction, and Crowdfunding. Newsviners will be asked to do the bulk of the research, interviews, and networking on the topics - reaching out to prominent organizations, interviewing high-profile figures in other social communities, and lending their own personal experiences to the mix as well. Newsviners will also have the opportunity for a "first crack" at the authorship of the final feature on the topics in question, tying the research and notes of dozens - perhaps hundreds - of citizen journalists into a single polished article.
The philosophy behind the entire project at Assignment Zero is transparency. Radical transparency. Every scrap of research, every interview, every draft, every critique and comment is publicly available and published under the Creative Commons license. It is a philosophy of growing import at Wired magazine, most enthusiastically espoused by Wired's Editor in Chief Chris Anderson. It is also one very much compatible with the ethos of social news sites like Newsvine. Writers for Assignment Zero are welcome to publish their articles to Newsvine directly, link them from Digg or Reddit , share their research, and distribute their interviews. The objective is one of collaborative creation, intelligent interaction, and professional publication. In a word: Crowdsourcing.
I'm very interested in working on the crowdfunding aspect. I've already got a few good ideas of various peoples to interview and whatnot. I'll throw my hat into the ring and volunteer to coordinate that one, unless someone else wants to duel me for it :-)
NewAssignment gets to maintain control over who writes and you'll have to "apply" with them for the spot
Just read that part. I've been signed up for a while now, but I'm not sure how to "apply" with them. Anyone got any clues?
I've looked into this a bit more, and I don't have all that much interest in writing any of these currently. So I'll step back and let someone else do the writing. I'm still up for research or whatnot if it's needed.
Adam --
These topics may have more to interest you buried inside them than you might glean on first notice.
Killfile told us he likes covering politics. We know Oldfogey is an old fogey on that beat, too. Crowdfunding offers a way to write about campaign fund-raising.
Many, if not all of you guys are writers. Which means, I'd gather that you're interested in how the craft may change through crowdsourcing. Or maybe you're more interested in what you write about than how you write about it. Maybe there's a book being opened up to the crowd related to topics that get you going. Do some digging. you may find that there's something in there to get you started.
The assignments that we provided are just ways to get people started. Where do you folks want to take it from there? As far as I'm concerned, the sky is the limit.
Lauren, what kind of time frame are we talking about? I still have some ideas on crowdfunding that have not been mentioned yet, so I am still interested, I just want to make sure I have time do this properly.
By the way, thanks for answering our questions and giving us a little motivation.
I've participated in a couple of ways that might (or might not) be considered crowdfunding, though not at all in the political arena. I wrote about onethousandpaintings (and bought a few), which I first read about in the Wired blog. I'm not sure you'd call it crowdfunding, but it was one of the first projects using the web to market a series of paintings (one thousand paintings, each of a number from one to 1000). The system was very well thought out by the artist and has been very successful (over 700 have now been sold).
I'm also particpating in a group license for browsercam through fundable.org I'd be happy to discuss either of these experiences, or write about my experiences, if they meet the criteria.
Thanks for getting this out to us so promptly, Kill.
I've been collecting names of volunteers for editing, researching, fact checking, etc. here. We've also done a lot of preliminary planning over here.
Kill, do you have any ideas as to how to go about picking our group leaders? Shall we wait for volunteers, or open up nominations, perhaps?
Here is Assignment Zero has to sayabout Newsvine's starting projects.
Thanks for the quick information relay, Killfile.
So, as I understand it, we now need to get three people to head up the various arms of this project. Those three people will then help organize any number of others to research their topic, conduct interviews, and write (I take it) any number of articles with the gathered information. Looking at the Assignment Zero information on their site, it looks like the organizational end is being handed to us, but others on NewAssignment.Net's site may contribute research and writing as well. Do I understand all of this correctly?
So then, what? All resultant articles will be turned in to NewAssignment.Net, which will then do a final editing and choose their favourites?
Sorry if I am being obtuse, I just found their site a little vague, and I want to be sure I know what I am getting into.
Thanks for stepping up Killfile and delivering this initial brief.
Just to reiterate, best way I can add value is as editor. Celestina's comment above suggests that if we do perform any editing, it will be before a piece hits NewAssignment.Net where, if the piece gets selected, it will undergo further editorial input their end?
Inevitable there will be some confusion initially. But I'm confident it will be worth it. Way to go.
Wanna work with me on editing these stories?
Lauren, I'm also up for editing, if you need further help.
Lauren - would be delighted to.
My thoughts on where I'd be best utilized.
I really don't think that I'm interested in writing -- my stylistic choices won't mesh well in a piece like this and I'm not really interested in writing unless I'm free to write in the style in which I'm comfortable. (This is another way of saying: "I don't write real good.")
So, I'll leave that to people who care about that sort of thing -- and who will undoubtedly put forth a better showing in this formal role than I would be capable of.
However, I do think I'd be interested in doing some form of research, or interviewing.
Copied and pasted from my recent retrospective:
Citizen Journalism
Those are some examples of my pseudo-investigative efforts over the past year -- just for the perusal of anyone who is going to be making decisions. (Team leaders, I guess.)
If not research -- I'd be equally (if not more) happy doing design and/or illustration work for the final piece. The AZ site lists this as a need, but I guess I'm not positive concerning the role they see a designer filling.
And, of course -- I can do both.
With that said -- I'm now jumping out of the fray.
Design? Illustration? Hell yeah! We were really under the gun to get this site launched, and we weren't able to psych out the visual side of storytelling. I'm married to a photojournalist, I'm a design maven -- I'm all about doing more on this site than working exclusively with words.
Might I suggest not tagging these articles with Newsvine?
Otherwise, they won't hit the featured writers section, and some who are interested may miss out.
Just a thought.
Thanks, Killfile. I, now, Dennis or Killfile, volunteer to help whoever gets the Novel thing. I have many ideas along that line and may just have a test bed for any practice needed on novel generation by a Crowd. I absolutely do not wish to lead this effort but will be glad to assist another to do so.
The appearance of an article by me in the Newsvine portion of AssignmentZero was not my intention. I wrote to what I presumed was a personal blog but open to the public. Had I known I would be writing for Newsvine I might have used a different tack.
I volunteer to head up the Crowdsourced Novel angle, but only if oldfogey holds good on his promise to help. I have, as some may have noticed, a mild obsession with shared mythologies...
I'll help out with the novel if you need it.
It is still confusing to me how this is going to work and how this is going to impact the vine. Looking at the journalistic standards there's no way my writing will make the cut, kind of a bummer there. Like Brian, my "own style" doesn't come close to any of the standards of the trained folks so we'll see how it unfolds. I registered and left a comment for oldfogey but was clueless what else to do there. Time and leadership from the rest should make it clear as we get underway.
Hi Pamela,
Lauren Sandler, here, editor of Assignment Zero. Take heart! We're not looking to replicate the voice of the New York Times, here. I, for one, think that the "standards of trained folk" tends to mean an extrication of all personality from writing. My heroes in journalism aren't a roster of what the Pulitzer committee deems excellent each year, but are the writers from the New Journalism era of the sixties and seventies who blew that voice (and perspective) to pieces: Joan Didion, Tom Wolfe, etc. True, the competition seems a bit stiff for the writing assignments. But if you want to get writing, we'll figure out a way. You appear concerned that you don't have the chops for this, but just reading your post, your sentence structure is dynamite.
There are a ton of assignments on our site. Not all of them are "write the big feature." We're also looking for shorter profiles of the projects that fall under the umbrellas of these big features. We're working right now on getting everything on the Desk internally linked so, for example, the big trend piece on crowdsourced nonfiction will link to our request for a profile of McKenzie Wark's Gamer Theory project. One of these pieces might be a good fit for you. Also, we'll want Q&As with major players on these projects, or people who are thinking about the big ideas related to them. As someone who has done Q&As for years, I can promise you that they're a great way to sharpen your writing. An ace intro to a Q&A has to be pithy, engaging, and packed with info. The Q&A itself is a model of structure and flow. You might find these assignments interesting as well.
I chose the three topics to send you folks because I thought they were so rich with ideas, stories, characters, and fascinating individual projects. I think there will be something in the package for everyone, regardless of experience.
thanks!
I think I am interested in heading up the nonfiction aspect but I have to poke around some more and figure out exactly what that entails. Please contact me if you are also interested in working on this subject and we can have a little powwow.
I have submitted my application. Below is the writeup I sent them:
I'm interested in the subject of crowdsourced nonfiction, capable of channeling my interest productively, and in a position to motivate others to participate. As a leader in the newsvine community, I have an advantage when it comes to organizing a group effort of newsviners. I'm familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of a great number of community members and I'm eager to help focus newsvine's unbridled energy into a productive workflow.
Looking over the material provided here on this subject, here are a few thoughts that spring to mind:
- We're discussing the "crowdsourcing of nonfiction books," but how strictly do we want to define "book"? The production process of a nonfiction book and that of a nonfiction website or documentary or lecture can to be pretty similar up until it comes time to consolidate everything into its final format. With this in mind, as leader I'd be willing to press various boundaries along these lines to get at the heart of "crowdsourcing" rather than to the heart of "books." The concept of "nonfiction" provides its own set of interesting questions - I have some background in narrative theory, for instance, enough to wonder if there is such a thing as "nonfiction" in any meaningful sense. A working definition of "the crowdsourcing of nonfiction books" is going to be the first thing on my agenda.
- As a recent university graduate in English, the nature of classroom discussion is still fresh in my mind. One additional aspect I'd like to explore is the way literary criticism (or, for that matter, cultural criticism) works with respect to crowdsourcing. Ever since the Modernist period there have been novels that can be described as rudimentarily hypertextual, and these demand a crowdsourced response. Why, then, isn't there a crowdsourced analysis of Finnegan's Wake? Instead, we have dozens of volumes by individual authors each trying to capture some aspect of the text, and while there will always be a place for this it's silly to think of any such text as definitive. In what ways would a "WikiWake" be better? In what ways would it suffer, especially in a field generally dominated by tenured professionals writing under pressure to publish "legitimate" work?
- Who gets the credit? As much as everyone's excited about the revolutionary idea of crowdsourced text, people still want their names in the byline. How do you deal with this issue when you have several dozen people contributing equally to a text? And, since we're talking nonfiction, this question gets teeth: who gets in trouble when a claim made turns out to be false? The great advantage of single-author-texts is that some people are just better writers/researchers than others - an author can develop a reputation over time, and if that reputation is tarnished it's his or her own fault. Crowdsourcing seems to lose this advantage - how do we make up for it?
...etc. These are issues that I've been toying with for a while now, so I have an idea of how to think about this subject. I'm eager to work with you because I think these questions are important in a larger context, but I'm also personally looking forward to taking some ideas that have been with me for a while and letting a group of qualified and enthusiastic individuals explore them with me.
I thank you for your consideration and look forward to hearing from you.
We're defintely keeping you in mind.
Traditionally, social media is narcissistic. Newsvine is no exception to this rule; but narcissism does not encourage consistent collaborative results.
So true.
g'morning. just a note to let you know that Lauren, Assignment Zero's editor, will be in here after she blogs to answer your questions.
Transparency or TMI?
Here's what I wrote Killfile this morning:
"Your explanation of what we're doing, and how we want to get Viners involved, was truly inspiring and clarifying. And by that I mean... for me.
Amanda and I are sitting in my dining room, sipping coffee in our pj's, extolling the virtues of your post. Amanda felt compelled to read the whole thing out loud. It gave us goosebumps."
Don't know that any of you Viners needed the image of Amanda and I all rumpled in our pajamas. But we were so revved by Killfile's email we got to work before we got dressed...
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |