Visit Killfile's column >>

KILLFILEHome Page

Epicurean Intelligentsia
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 303; Links Seeded: 7536
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/07/2009

When The Hell Is Easter? -- An Introduction to the Computus

This is more or less exactly how I feel after writing this article.

Photo by Andrea Allen. (License: Creative Commons Attribution)

advertisement

Tomorrow is Easter, perhaps the most important fest and event in the Christian Liturgical Year. Easter Sunday marks the celebration of Jesus' resurrection in the first century AD, viewed by Christians as a triumph over death and the moment of salvation for humankind. As Christendoms most important feast, Easter is also one of its oldest; records of Easter celebrations stretch back to 154 AD, slightly more than a century after the crucifixion.

But though histories provide a detailed account of Easters in years past, they fail us in the smaller measures of time. At present, Easter Sunday is celebrated in a widely varying range between the end of March and the end of April. Earlier Christian traditions celebrated the feast earlier in the months, with Easter falling between early April and early May. Over the centuries Christians have used differing calendars ranging from the Hebrew to the Julian, and the Gregorian - each placing Easter on a different day of the year.

A Brief History of Time (with apologies to Mr. Hawking)

Though the Bible provides an excellent account of the crucifixion of Jesus it does so without a frame of reference. The Crucifixion, biblically, follows the Last Supper, which is itself a celebration of Passover. Passover, however, is fixed in the Hebrew Calendar as a six day feast, beginning on the 15th day of Nisan and ending on the 21st. Problematically, the Hebrew calendar is lunar rather than solar, and has little correlation whatsoever to the standard Gregorian calendar.

The early Church, in a portent of policy and structure to come, responded bureaucratically. During the First Council of Nicaea (325 AD), Christians agreed that a common method should be used to calculate the day of Easter and, moreover, that this date should always fall on a Sunday. Following Nicaea, the Church used several methods for the calculation as it spread throughout the Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire. By the 3rd century AD, Easter was calculated based upon the Alexandrian method, itself derived from the Egyptian civil solar calendar1. By the 6th Century, the Byzantine Method arose in churches along the fringes of the Byzantine Empire, itself a remnant of the Eastern Roman Empire2.

In 535 AD the Emperor Dionysus introduced the "Christian Era," instituting the custom of enumerating dates from the birth of Jesus, and giving rise to the modern nomenclature of AD (Anno Domini -- In the year of [Our] Lord). The Dionysian reforms also included "Easter tables" which provided a equivalency between Passover, the Hebrew Calendar, and the decisions at Nicaea.

Dionysius' tables remained in use throughout the Western Church until the Gregorian Calendar reforms which altered the official structure of the year and made the tables unusable.

The Gregorian System

The introduction of the Gregorian calendar in 1582 made the Dionysian tables obsolete and necessitated a new method for calculating the proper day for the feast of Easter. This is the method used today and accounts for the wide variation of the date upon which Easter falls.

Step 1 - Determine the Epact

The Epact is the offset in days between the lunar and solar year. A lunar year is 11 days shorter than the solar year so the Epact itself increases by eleven with every (solar) year. However, once the Epact exceeds 30, a lunar month (30 days) is removed meaning that the calculation of the Epact itself is a modulus operation. 2006 provides an excellent starting point for these calculations as the lunar and solar years began on the same day in 2006. Thus 2006 had an Epact of 0. In January 1, 2007 the new lunar year was already 11 days old, so the Epact for 2007 is 11. In 2008 the Epact will be 22, and in 2009 it will be 3 owing to the modulus nature of the calculation3.

Step 2 - Determine The Ecclesiastical New Moon

This is where it gets ugly. A listing of all 365 calendar days is made (leap days are ignored, they are a solar calendar convenience). Starting on January 1, dates are labeled with a Roman Numeral starting with a place-holder character (we'll call it *) and then descending from 29 (xxix) through 1 (i). In practice this generates a January listing with January 2 - 30 labeled as xxix through i respectively and January 1 and 31 labeled as *.

This is repeated through the end of the year, but exceptions apply. Starting with the second period (the one beginning on February 1), every other period consists of 29 rather than 30 days. In the 29 day periods the 25th (xxv) and 24th (xxiv) days fall on the same date, allowing for the shortened period. The thirteenth period is, as the math would suggest a "long" period. Finally, the label of 25 (without a Roman numeral) is added to any date labeled 26 (xxvi) within the even numbered (29 day) cycles.

The resulting migraine inducing table is called the calendarium. With it, ecclesiastical new moons may be predicted by looking for dates labeled with the value of the year's Epact.

Step 3 - Determine the Dominical Letter

In addition to roman numerals, the calendar year is also labeled with letters ranging from A to G starting, again, on January 1 and continuing through the end of the year. The letter which falls on the first Sunday of the year is the Dominical Letter, and all other days with that letter throughout the year will also be Sundays4. Dominical letters cycle backwards one day each year, however in leap years5 Sundays will move back one additional letter following February 24th. If one happens to be a 12th century priest in provincial France, the Dominical Letter system is helpful in navigating the tables and charts necessary to determine the mathematical structure of the year. In more modern times, however, these are largely irrelevant and, as such, may be safely ignored.

Step 3 - Wait for March 21... and then wait a little longer

Easter is a spring festival and as such must be celebrated in the spring. March 21 has nothing specifically to do with the actual Vernal Equinox, which marks the beginning of spring. It is, however, a simple enough approximation of the equinox and is thus used as a convenient demarcation of the beginning of spring. Starting from March 21, the first ecclesiastic Full Moon may be found by searching for a date that falls thirteen days after the ecclesiastic New Moon. Starting from this Full Moon, called the "Paschal Full Moon," the first following Sunday will be Easter Sunday.

A Few More Catches

The entire system, however, hinges upon the lunar and solar cycles lining up in a very specific manner. Problematically, they simply do not do this. The above cycles should create a nineteen (solar) year cycle, called the Metonic cycle, as 19 solar years should work out to the same number of days as 235 synodic6 months. This predicts that Epacts and the various enumerations above would repeat every 19 years. Unfortunately, the math is off and an increment of the Epact is necessary every 19 years for the cycle to repeat, though even this fails to address the issue. Epacts are adjusted in this manner on the first year of the Metonic cycle, or on years evenly divisible by 19.

Further complicating the matter, in any year valued eleven or higher in the Metonic cycle which also has an Epact of xxv the New Moon will fall on the label of "25" rather than xxv in the short months where that label exists.

The Metonic cycle itself has a two hour discrepancy over the course of its 19 year period. Though this is remarkably close, the result is a full day of error every 219 years, requiring more manual adjustment.

The "Solar Equation" further complicates the calculations. The Gregorian Calendar drops three "leap days" every 400 years (on the century year) and as such the Epact is reduced by one on these years as well.

Serving much the same purpose, the "Lunar Equation" forces an increment of the Epact some eight times in a 2500 year span, amounting to once every three centuries. This increment will be skipped, however, between 3900 and 4300 AD which marks the beginning of a new cycle.

The result of this and several other complications too specific to mention results in a 5,700,000 year cycle for the so-called "Computus" or method for calculating the date of Easter. In the long run, April 19 is the most common day upon which Easter may fall, making up just sort of 4% of the cycle. March 22 is the least common, accounting for less than half a percent. In some sense it is quite comforting to see that the Catholic Church has judged it worthwhile to plot out the dates of Easter stretching over a nearly 6 Million Year cycle. On the other, such revelations lend new insight into the tedium of life in 12th century France7.

Works Cited

Wikipedia: Computus
Wikipedia: Easter
Wikipedia: Calendars
Wikipedia: Easter Controversy
Wikipedia: Passover
Wikipedia: Paschal Full Moon
Wikipedia: Epact
Wikipedia: Dominical Letter
Wikipedia: Golden Numbers
Wikipedia: Metonic Cycle

  • 18 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
9.1
2.1
{"commentId":629286,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

I was raised Catholic so the particular insanities of calculating Easter were actually imparted upon me at an early age. I'm more or less convinced that I can pin my present day dislike of math on this fact, but I'm not certain. My mother-in-law asked me last Easter how we come up with the day which resulted in my telling her the short version -- First Sunday after the First Full Moon after March 21.

But I work for a web development company that's building a product called Cingo (no link provided to avoid self-promotion, but you can probably guess it if you care) and in the course of writing this product we decided that we needed a calendar. So I set out to write this calendar and, later on, to put a set of holidays into it (which still aren't there). One of those holidays was Easter.

If this were a movie, at this point we would either cut to me screaming at the top of my lungs at actually punching out my computer monitor or perhaps killing my co-workers with my keyboard.

In reality I realized that mathematically teaching a computer about when easter happens is like trying to teach a toddler differential calculus. In the process, however, I worked out most of what's in the article above. Hopefully you, gentle reader, will prove easier to enlighten than PHP was.

This article also serves as entry #5 in the Last Viner Standing series.

{"commentId":629286,"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147","authorDomain":"killfile"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Apr 7, 2007 9:35 PM EDT
{"commentId":629507,"authorDomain":"atvance"}

A very interesting article; I did not realize the complexity that went into determining Easter's date. I was raised Christian, but didn't really pay attention to the hows and whys of Easter placement in the calender; I just wanted to know when we had to get to church early for the breakfast. Now I'm just glad when someone reminds me when variable-date holidays occur so I'm not wondering why stores/banks are closed.

Of course I've always calculated when Easter was in a rather backwards way. After I learned the date of Mardi Gras, I'd count forward 40 days and voila, Easter!

{"commentId":629507,"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147","authorDomain":"atvance"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sun Apr 8, 2007 1:10 AM EDT
{"commentId":630350,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

Of course I've always calculated when Easter was in a rather backwards way. After I learned the date of Mardi Gras, I'd count forward 40 days and voila, Easter!

If only the Catholic Church had thought of that!

In other news, I believe this is now officially the least well received article I've ever written for Newsvine.

{"commentId":630350,"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147","authorDomain":"killfile"}
  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Sun Apr 8, 2007 7:50 PM EDT
{"commentId":649724,"authorDomain":"sheep"}

From what this Jew knows of the computus -- in deciding to be an a-religionist I took it upon myself to learn as much as I could about many religions, and I especially love the arcane stuff -- there is one part of the calculation you didn't mention, but which may be accounted for by some of the other equations: I believe that there is an asterisk at the very end which says "except if Easter Sunday should fall on the same day as the beginning of Passover." I'm not sure what the action taken is at that point, and my source or my memory may be completely wrong, but I'm just wondering if you'd heard that caveat.

Oh, and we're not crying for you, dude: most of us would be ecstatic to get the level of attention that constitutes your "least well-received article"!

:D

{"commentId":649724,"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147","authorDomain":"sheep"}
  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:33 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":629602,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

I just wait for the bunny.

{"commentId":629602,"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Apr 8, 2007 5:35 AM EDT
{"commentId":629876,"authorDomain":"craig19"}

Easter="Ishstar"?

Ishtar is a mother goddess, fertility goddess, the goddess of spring, a storm goddess, a warrior goddess and goddess of war, a goddess of the hunt, a goddess of love, goddess of marriage and childbirth, and a goddess of fate.

She was also an underworld deity, her twin sister being Ereshkigal, the Goddess of Death, but her dominant aspects are as the mother goddess of compassion and the goddess of love, sex and war.

As the goddess of love, Ishtar was irresistible. Her lovers were legion and she was the matron of courtesans and prostitutes. Ishtar herself was the 'courtesan of the gods' and she was the first to experience the desires which she inspired. Sovereign of the world by virtue of love's omnipotence, Ishtar was the most popular goddess in Assyria and Babylonia

{"commentId":629876,"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147","authorDomain":"craig19"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Apr 8, 2007 12:09 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"91916","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"91916","contentId":"653147"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking