You may have read this story earlier this week. A female volunteer for a Presidential campaign was brutally assaulted by an enraged male supporter of the other party's candidate. That story was all over the news, covered in depth by cable TV, internet, print, radio, and alternative media alike. The victim's name was Ashley Todd and she was – for lack of a better word – a liar.
But the victim's name was also Nancy Takehara and, unlike Ashley Todd, she is not a liar. While Todd "carved" the now-infamous-B into her own cheek with a pencil eraser and fabricated the entire story of her assault, Takehara's McCain-supporting attacker actually confessed to his crime.1 Todd's story was a complete fabrication that somehow made national news whereas Takehara's is verifiably true and yet remains almost totally unknown by the American public.
And knowing this, it is very difficult not to speculate as to why that might be.
Ashley Todd is not just a liar, but an uncommonly bad liar. Her story was disjointed and lacked in specifics and details. Her self-applied "mutilation" was quite obviously backwards – as if applied in a mirror – and every shred of physical evidence that should have corroborated her story was conspicuously absent. Yet, despite all of this, sensationalist and partisan news sources jumped all over the story. Matt Drudge ran this headline2 in a font that can only be described as "72-point Second Coming:"
SHOCK: MCCAIN VOLUNTEER ATTACKED AND MUTILATED IN PITTSBURGH...'B' CARVED INTO 20-YEAR OLD WOMAN'S FACE... DEVELOPING...
Nancy Takehara, in contrast, has had her story corroborated by the very man who assaulted her, confirmed by several local papers and publications, and is officially listed as a victim in an ongoing police investigation of her attack. Yet Takehara's assault failed to attract general media attention, failed to inflame the indignation of the right-wing blogosphere, and failed to generate "Repent the End Is Neigh" style headlines on the Drudge Report.3
Certainly the nature of the story figures into this discrepancy. Media in the United States is profit seeking and so one can hardly blame it for capitalizing on exciting stories that are apt to boil American blood: a young woman brutally assaulted, a bitter partisan divide, and – let's not be naïve here – black man attacking a white woman.
Americans like stories that confirm what we already suspect about the world and, for most, that does not include grandmotherly Asian women being beaten by US marine veterans shouting incoherently about ACORN. Ashley Todd's fabrication played to our preconceptions much more eloquently: the animalistic and enraged black man, the helpless little white girl, the coerced support of liberal policies.
But Todd's story had a little help too. On Friday, October 24th, Talking Points Memo revealed the extent to which the McCain campaign furthered the unsubstantiated and racially incendiary hoax:4
John McCain's Pennsylvania communications director told reporters in the state an incendiary version of the hoax story about the attack on a McCain volunteer well before the facts of the case were known or established -- and even told reporters outright that the "B" carved into the victim's cheek stood for "Barack," according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions.
In contrast, the Obama campaign first declined to comment on the Takehara story immediately after the assault occurred, though the Jr Illinois Senator did contact the victim to reassure her and offer his support. In a statement released the following day, the Obama camp took a far more measured tone then that later adopted by the McCain campaign, stating the following:5
Last night's unfortunate incident in Caledonia was isolated and extremely rare, and we are grateful our volunteer is doing well. Thousands of Wisconsinites welcome our canvassers at the doors each and every day and whether or not they support Barack Obama. There is an overwhelming desire across the state to have a dialogue about how to bring our country forward.
It is a difference in style and substance that has characterized the two candidates, the two campaigns, and the two parties and indeed may serve as a shorthand for the entire 2008 Presidential election. Where John McCain's strategy has been one of impulsive and sometimes ill considered gambles, Barack Obama's has been a measured course of deliberate, contemplative, and cautious advance.
This dichotomy of rash impulse and deliberate decision is one that has replayed itself in every aspect of the 2008 election. It is evident in the contrast between neophyte governor Sarah Palin and veteran Senator Joe Biden, present in McCain's attempts to play hero with the bailout bill while Obama insisted that the debates must go on, and illustrated yet again in the campaigns' handling of the cases of Ashley Todd and Nancy Takehara.
With the salivating complicity of the conservative media apparatus, McCain has once again thrown his dice and once again he's come up the loser.
1. Journal Times
2. Huffington Post
3. Google Trends
4. Talking Points Memo
5. Journal Times





