Back On The Airwaves, Glenn Beck Loses 16 More Ad Sponsors

In response to redsfan......from what I just read., you are the uneducated racist. All you liberal lefties can't do anything but name call.....just like you're supreme leader Nancy Pelosi. Argue view points, and ideas....but grow up and leave the name calling for the playground.

All you liberal lefties can't do anything but name call.

hmm so name calling is bad, do you support Beck?

reddirthippy, I'm a supporter of Freedom, Justice for All, and the pursuit of happiness, the true American Way. I can't say I'm a supporter, but I believe in listening to what both sides have to say. Then, and only then, will I make a decision on any debate. But, I'm also not blind....nor am I a follower of any party. That's what's wrong with this country now.....party support. Without thinking about what's really the right thing for all of us. If this country is so bad, and in such need of Obama's "Change", then why are our borders being flooded. And why does this nation consist of every race, every creed. Every country around the world is represented in THIS country. Why did they come here if things are so bad? Yes, some things are in need of repair....but don't change our entire way of life!

don't change our entire way of life!

Exactly how has your "way of life" been changed as a result of President Obama's policies?

And why do you hate Nancy Pelosi so much?

And how many hours a week do you watch Fox "News"?

I can't say I'm a supporter,

Fair enough

Do you think "supreme leader Nancy Pelosi" is anything other than name calling?

Rita, ever read the posts of your neanderthal siblings on here? They call names just like everyone else and promote more hatred than an old fashioned KKK gathering. Nancy represents a district in California. She's a damned house member, not the POTUS. How about that road kill Mitch McConnell from KY. Looks like he needs some KY and someone should let him know he is deceased before he heads back to DC after this summer recess.

jmonarchy,

You apparently don't much about how your government works. Pelosi may not be the POTUS, but as Speaker, she has actually more power than the POTUS. She is certainly much more than "a damned house member." POTUS can only suggest and persuade, make some appointments, but the Speaker controls the House which has the power of the purse. Given a choice between the 2 offices, I'd be Speaker - there is no term limit and one could potentially be Speaker for decades, taking down any president she disagreed with or assisting one she did support.

The Speaker's power isn't just in the House - they have huge influence in the senate and other spheres of government.

At any rate, I think the comments on this thread are moot. Everyone has shades of "ism."

If any white president had a pastor who denounced black people and screamed G-damn American from the pulpit, they would have been crucified. If George Bush or anyone had said of the woman who raised them, "She was a typical black person," there would have been hell to pay.

I don't understand why so many people insist on treating Obama as if he is a plaster saint or the Messiah himself who should never be criticized. That comes with the job of POTUS - constant criticism. I'm sick to death of every criticism of him being labeled as racism. He hasn't done much since he took office - I'm still waiting for this big change to make us better. So, far he has taken a bunch of vacations, loves to take AF One out, and announced that slavery needs to be taught in school - since he went to school in Indonesia, he apparently doesn't know it has been taught here for at least 150 years.

There are serious issues in this country that need to be addressed and I'm sorry, but who gives a flip what an uneducated uninformed jerk like Glenn Beck thinks? How that man got more than 1 person to ever listen to him is beyond me.

Same with Kanye West - he's entitled to his opinion, and I'm no Bush supporter, but that was pure racism from West. The people in New Orleans live in a city below sea level yet they had no plan for evacuation - they should have all drowned. They knew the levee was in danger of not holding - had known that for decades. They gambled and they lost. It was not Bush's responsibility to take care of NO - it was theirs and they are so stupid they reelected the same Mayor who did not take care of them to begin with. As Forrest Gump's mother said, "Stupid is as stupid does."

If you're truly against racism, you need to punish everyone for racist remarks, not just the conservative white guys.

Magsby: good analysis of the power of the Speakership. The Speaker not only controlls committee assignments, but assigns office space to House members: a huge club to wield over the recalcitrant House members.

Beck, Rush, Hannity etc are the Paul Reveres of our age, sounding the alarm, and letting the people know that the enemy is upon us.

All you liberal lefties can't do anything but name call.....just like you're supreme leader Nancy Pelosi.

I am still waiting for just one point that Beck has made to be proven wrong. JHC, Beck all but called Jones then next Joseph Stalin and all the White House said was "stop calling them czars"...wtf is that all about?

LOLOLOLOL

They're the Paul Reveres of our time?

I can hear it now.

"The euthanizers are coming! The euthanizers are coming!"

pffftt.

(as an aside, how big do you suppose Rush's horse would have to be?)

Rush's horse is actually an Elephant.

All you liberal lefties can't do anything but name call.

I love an accusation of name calling ... with a side of lumping people together in a stereotype. Great irony.

Rush's horse is actually an Elephant.

More like an Irrelephant...

Poor elephant

LOL -

or Sicko-phant

Paul Revere was actually alerting the Patriots of the approaching Brittish Army. It was our revolutionary war. These dim wits are trying to incite a 21st century civil war. Magsby, how many bills come from the house that get shot down, negotiated and kicked back by the senate? Must I remind you that there must be a mojority vote on the House floor, as well? Pelosi is simply an orchestra director, but the house has a stronger pulse for the nation because there are so many districts represented in lieu of a couple of senators from each state. As a last result, if the Senate passes a bill that is not in line with what the POTUS wants, he can veto it and send it back where it can be over-riden or he can simply do what George Bush did and have his legal staff attach signing statements to interpret the legislation as they see fit. Mitt Romney's religon is LDS, so should he be held responsible for the polygamy that was practiced openly or that still takes place in the purist sects of that religon? And for your information, deny it and I'll call you a liar, if an elderly lady is walking to her car in a sparcely populated area or parking lot and is approached by a group of young black teens, she is very likely to feel afraid. Not because the blacks are evil, but because she has been conditioned over the years to just fear blacks. It was a very real thing up through the 70's so don't deny it. I don't treat or look at Obama as a miracle worker or a Messiah, but how quickly we forget that Reagan was the Right's Messiah and in MY oppinion, he was one of the worst presidents we ever had. He diluted and trampled on the constitution, created a multi-trillion dollar war on drugs that has done NOTHING for stopping drug use, allows the government to commit crimes in order to ENTRAP someone that would have likely never performed the crime. I would venture to say that Nancy Reagan would have been the real change for America and probably kept Ron from going totally crazy with unconstitutional policies. I'm not saying criticism is racist, but the majority of the lies spread by Beck, Hannity, Rush and O'Reilly are simply that. The birthers have been proven wrong time and time again, thus Beck and the other dumb arses spread that and CONTINUE to so there's one point that is a proven lie that Beck continues on with. He's a drunken drop out, Hannity is a drunken drop out, Limbaugh is a drunken and narcotic abusing drop out. You choose them as your leaders, I'll choose mine.

TheyreAllCrooks: Agree wholeheartedly! The Pubs will dip into their coffers to keep him on the air! He's one of their poster boys!!

I don't think they care why you watch it...just so long as you watch.....That's why they're #1

So you have no problem with a man on the White House payroll pressuring sponsers to boycott Beck? None at all?

Beck is still on ....so...so much for all the carzy hype.

Not the equivalent of the pope, the LDS is a quack religion.

super: the most sensitive religion in the United States, whose members take offense at just about anything)

d.b.-661337 :Not the equivalent of the pope, the LDS is a quack religion.

Super where do you get your information. Making mass assumptions is faulty at best.

DB: have some respect at least. Insulting someone's religion is bigoted at best.

You two are part of the problem of this once great nation. By making mass assumptions about a religion and insulting them, you are adding to the problems, not coming up with solutions.

To really solve the nation's problems, we have to all work together to get solutions. Does not matter what religion, sex, sexual preference. The solutions need to come from us.

And your statements are not adding to that solution. So pull your heads out of your posteriors, meet some Mormons. You might find that you have more in common than you know.

I've met plenty of Mormons. Most are stern, shrewd and calloused. I have worked for them as a general contractor and they aren't the kind that run around singing, "Makes me love everybody, give me that old time religon." Christians, knowing that Jesus was quoted as saying it is over, I am Alpha and Omega and John The Revelator in Revelations was inspired by God to say this was the final book of the Bible and any other doctrine was false doctrine. Now in the 1800's some guy named Smith gets a visit from God and he adds some more stuff for those chosen people. I have come to the determination that the only true worshippers of God and Jesus are the Jehovah Witnesses. They act as Jesus instructed, mild, subversive, meek. Ah the days when the pulpits were used for spreading the gospel in lieu of propoganda, hatred and political oppinion. How many surprised folks are going to burn in hell that thought they had a ticket to ride to Heaven.

jmonarchy, do you really think your comments are appropriate? If I said that Jews or Catholics or Muslims were "stern, shrewd and calloused" based on supposedly working as a general contractor with a few of them that that isn't bigoted? Let's see classifying a group of entire individuals based on the encounter of a few is let's see hmmmm, racist, bigoted, etc.

Let's see classifying a group of entire individuals based on the encounter of a few is let's see hmmmm, racist, bigoted, etc.

like calling someone a racist based on something his preacher said?

grek, if a racist preacher said something once and he got up and left, then no, he wouldn't be a racist. Sitting there for 20 years and not saying a word until your preacher is outed by the press is being a racist and an opportunist.

Well, the thing about the Rev. is that it was taken out of context of that particular sermon.

AND out of twenty years of recorded sermons there are only one or two instances that would be deemed questionable by 'racists'...Think about it...if this were a racist person, there would be hundreds of recorded sermons to use as examples...there is only this one that people point to...that aught to tell you something...

Does that make twenty years worthless?

Does that make someone a racist for saying it?...

Does that make anyone who listens to it racists?

How many times in the last twenty years have you said something that not everyone agrees with?...

dcstone01

How many times in the last twenty years have you said something that not everyone agrees with?...

Okay I fess up - at least fifteen times on this thread alone - I'll do my penance now - Gee I hate these time out corners.

Time's up - I'm back

lol...

Not the equivalent of the pope, the LDS is a quack religion.

I've lived in Utah since birth - my dad is a former Mormon and I am married to a Mormon, though I have never been a Mormon myself. They don't grow horns at midnight, I promise. There's some real @!$%#s in that church, just like every other church, that part I won't deny.

But really? If you want to call the LDS church quack, be prepared to call them all quacks.

Christians, knowing that Jesus was quoted as saying it is over, I am Alpha and Omega and John The Revelator in Revelations was inspired by God to say this was the final book of the Bible and any other doctrine was false doctrine.

Funny, since the Gospel of John was written after the book of Revelation. Also interesting to note, that Moses said pretty much the same thing in Deuteronomy or Leviticus, and yet we have the rest of the Old Testament and the New Testament.

The argument that there cannot be anymore doctrine is false. God loves all people, in all times, in all places, so why not continue speaking to prophets and revealing his will?

John the Revelator is not John of the Gospel Of John, according to a huge consensus of Bible Scholars. The LDS practiced openly for years marrying multiple wives. Granted it has been shunned by the modern leadership, but many of the purist of the faith still practice polygamy. I am not downing them, but as a person of Christian Faith, it seems 180 degrees out of sync with the Christian Religon. As I have stated before, though I am not a Jehovah Witness, I tend to believe that those folks are the only ones leading a real Christ like life. Meek, humble and charitable.

Still though, the Gospel of John was written well after the Book of Revelation this is likewise agreed upon by a plethora of Bible Scholars.

It is funny how when people want to slam the LDS faith they bring up the practice of polygamy. Some facts about this practice. It was practiced by less than 5% of the members of the church. Many of the marriages were not consummated. Many of the "wives" lived in different homes, and relied on their "husband" for support only. Those who are "purists" of the LDS faith of practice polygamy are not at all members of the church.

Meek, humble and charitable

A lot of members of the LDS faith are the same way. We give freely of our time, talents, and money to help those in need. Many of the members of the Church are meek and humble no matter their societal status.

I grew up near a polygamist settlement - they're a different breed than mainstream Mormons.

And really, the Mormons are really quite charitable. You don't have to be a Christian to be charitable. I claim NO religion, and I still give freely of my time.

This country deserves better than the Beck"s, Dobbs', Limbaugh, Hannity's and O'Riley's. These people are the ones that set the tone for what people in other countries think of us. Many don't care what others think; but I do. I hate being viewed as narrow minded, racist and hateful just because I'm an American.

People with more positive views should do more to give this country a positive image abroad. It's shameful what some on the right and left write about the people whose politics they don't like. We can do better. We are a much better country than that.

Wingnuts? huh???? Now what kind of mature, educated, American would call another American these kind of names. You guys make me sick. Beck may push the limits, but he does cause real people to think and begin to ask questions. Without questions, this country will be the blind leading the blind. It is our right to hear both sides, God knows you Demos scream loud enough. If nothing that he says is true, then why does it really bother you? People will sooner or later discover the truth, then who will be the liar? Obama or Beck?

Killfile, the Reverend Jim Jones was a liar and a fraud, too, and he had a similar following as Beck.

Rita ...You are right! They do not want the truth out...yup, otherwise they would ignore all except their MSM!

And just reading some of these ignorant, name-calling, uneducated-sounding ppl shows all of us what voted for the present DC bunch!

Got an email a while back asking "WHO IS THIS"....after the first 1 or 2 questions, a person would just KNOW it was Obama....well surprise!! The actual 'answer' was Adolf H! Wow! Soooo...refrain from refering the finder-of-truth to that name!

Jones actually did some good before he went cuckoo, though. I think his intentions were originally good. Beck's intentions are to make every last dollar that he can.

Jaybe

Funny I got an email and when I got half way through reading it I would have said the article was about Adolf Hitler - turned out to be George W. Bush.

Jayb, that Hitler, Nazi, Socialist, Communist, Marxist rhetoric is for the very lowest of the low. Do yourself a favor, improve your image and stop with the stupidity.

Show me what's racist on the CofC website.

You could be right, but I don't think so. I can tell you for a fact that people who are living on the dole are usually not participants in anything: boycotts or otherwise. They are totally out of the loop. The only thing they're concerned about is whether they will get their check on time. They usually don't vote; and are not concerned about the things that working individuals are concerned about.

I also think that many people are simply fed up with the tired old inflamatory language that is broadcast on some media outlets. I refuse to listen to a totally partisan program: whether that program is pro democrat or pro republican. There's nothing to be learned from a program that is only concerned with on view.

Look at the home picture on the website, it shows loud rude people.

What in the world are you talking about?

One of the few pictures shows a guy talking into a microphone. He's clearly not yelling. At best, for your assertion, he looks possibly energized by what he's saying. Not yelling, and certainly not loud or rude.

The other, few pictures are of headless people modeling T-shirts. That's pretty common nowadays.

Colorofchange sounds racist just by their own statement:

ColorOfChange.org exists to strengthen Black America's political voice

change the wording to White America and all the liberals would be sreaming about the KKK.

change the wording to White America and all the liberals would be sreaming about the KKK.

The KKK, or other such monstrosities of stupidity, are the only ones that would even worry about white people not having a strong political voice.

Look at the home picture on the website, it shows loud rude people.

Most of the pictures of loud, rude people I've seen lately are at the town hall meetings.

Colorofchange.org is a racist Black website.

from the front page of the website:

"we are united behind a simple, powerful pledge: we do all we can to make sure all Americans are represented, served and protected- regardless of race or class"

-Freakin' evil racist bastards! I think we all know that "all" is code for "black only" right? as is "regardless of race..."
oh yeah, I'm pretty sure when anybody says those things what they REALLY mean is that they'd like to be able to lump whole groups of people together and assume that their race determines their worth and/or capacity.

it's easy to see how a rational person came to the conclusion that this is a black only racist webisite there Greg.

hey, tell again about how the website itself has beliefs?

This site believes if you don't like Obama your a racist..

I've never seen a website that was so self aware!

greck:

This site believes if you don't like Obama your a racist..

I've never seen a website that was so self aware!

____________________________________

otflmao - inanimate objections having self-awareness - Haaaaaa

Also I agree - such unbelievable audacity to champion "all" people and "all" races = damn racist people (sicker).

Greck and JoulesBeef, = Jackals of the Serengeti bottom of the food chain

Your frustrated and insulting people because they're always 1 notch ahead of you lemons

note:

I present you with facts, you call me names.

thank you once again for displaying who you are.

Great Greg:

Greck and JoulesBeef, = Jackals of the Serengeti bottom of the food chain

So you must be really frustrated cause your pot is just as black as the kettle right about now.

btw: Nice self-proclaimed name you got there - seems a little delusional, imo.

Aww Great Greg:

The more you post the more your frustrations show - Frankly, I have only read post that would challenge you to tell the truth and not some made up right wing talking point. Is it that hard to speak truthfully or is it so much more easier to spew propaganda with out facts to back them up? Where are the links? You make a statement and then say go look up the proof cause you can't seem to find it...very disingenuous and really bears little credibility.

Debeki,

I don't believe in propaganda or changing the meaning of an article to fit my taste like the above, nor do I insult ladies like Joules, see my comment 1.4 ...

And enough of the Aww crap, LOL

First of all - I thought Joules was a guy. second of all your post smack of insults and

Awww Greg - just cause you say enough doesn't mean anyone is listening to you. As for propaganda - where's your proof - you point fingers without backing up your finger pointing - saying something doesn't always make it a truth therefore it becomes nothing more than propaganda.

The KKK, or other such monstrosities of stupidity, are the only ones that would even worry about white people not having a strong political voice.

That is just not true.

People... living off the government who probably spend very little.

So is that sort of like an endorsement for the Public Option?

Debeki,

I know joules is a guy

nor do I insult ladies like Joules, see my comment 1.4 ...

My mistake, it should have read, "nor do I insult ladies like Joules does".

I'm surprised you couldn't figure that out especially after reading comment 1.4

great greg,
let's recap:

you said:

Colorofchange.org is a racist Black website.

to which I responded with a quote from the front page of the website indicating otherwise. I will admit I sarcastically ridiculed some of the sillier of things in your post, but the gist of my response was based in fact.

to which you responded:

Greck and JoulesBeef, = Jackals of the Serengeti bottom of the food chain

Your frustrated and insulting people because they're always 1 notch ahead of you lemons.

I then pointed out that your response to presentation of fact was name calling and you accuse me of:

1) being a sewer rodent and 2) insulting anyone with a differing viewpoint.

(note: no fact presentation in any of your posts in this conversation yet)

anyway, i don't think I NEED to call you names. The facts speak for themselves. You're doing a great job at displaying who you are and anyone viewing the thread can insert whatever label they feel appropriate.

Great Greg:

I'm not the one reading minds here (You seem to think you know what a website believes) - if you don't state exactly what you mean - I don't profess to have esp or telepathy - I can only go by what you are posting and then I state an opinion on what I read.

I am so amuzed by the constant barage of lies and twisted information that my friends forward to me. It's ok to be a conservative and to disagree with the left, but don't be stupid for God's sake. Don't be a paddle on the rumor mill or a pawn on some spin doctor's chess board. Perhaps these folks should look at the tag on Newsvine,.....Get Smarter here.

I told one of my conservative propoganda email forwarding friends that he was actually an embarrassment to himself for not fact checking these things. He is a business owner and appears to be a Springer Show Follower, because that is what these nut cases look to be.

Joules,
The only reason white people are "over represented" in government service is because until 15-20 years ago, we were the MAJORITY of the population. It's only the influx of the immigrants, mostly non-white, over the past couple of decades that has caused white people to become a smaller proportion of the total population. When you consider people who actually vote, whites are still a majority.

Re:#7.7...I would love to give Obama a 'surprise'American history test one day.

He doesn't care about America & all her struggling years of remaining a

wonderful FREE nation. He would flunk.........

Re:#7.7...I would love to give Obama a 'surprise'American history test one day.

He doesn't care about America & all her struggling years of remaining a

wonderful FREE nation. He would flunk.........

What are you talking about? Seriously, I don't understand your comment.

Jaybe

I think President Obama would pass your history test - I bet George W. Bush wouldn't be able to answer the first question.

The only thing I get from Glenn Beck is his passion. I only wish so many other people shared the passion to speak out when a government has wronged you so bad (Bush/Obama).

I love that my US Senator just replied that he had an overwhelming response from his people and could not respond to my e-mail yet would read our comments.

Is this a democracy working or what!?!?!?!!!!!

Awesome, to finally hear people speak out in every aspect. Thank you America. "I am finally proud" - Mishelle Obama.... oh what I would not say that "I am finally proud of my people are standing up because they love our country". Our Country, maybe not government, but our America.

JayB,

...I would love to give Obama a 'surprise'American history test one day.

LMAO, That would be Hilarious!!!

I am just for freedom!!!

The government is awful and can't support us. It is sad to see people in cities that believe only the government can support them. Come on out to the country. You do not need a government for Food, Shelter, Clothing, and those things you are used to spending 10 times more for... are 10 times less here.

Become American. Live free. Enjoy life not of how another judges you!

I don't care for Beck at all, because he's a melodramatic fool most of the time, but I question the rapidity with which his advertisers are leaving him. It smacks deliciously of government strong-arming,

Very good possibility, there used to be on You Tube the speech that Obama's Economic Advisor Reich gave along with Charles Rangel, in which Reich stated that they are going to produce construction jobs for all except White male construction workers. Anyway they removed it, I'm wondering if it was from some heat in Washington.. But if you Google "Reich white male construction worker" there are still some copies going around.

Obama, condoned it.

Perhaps Beck is going to be made the "horrible example."

But maybe I'm just cynical.

____________

I think "paranoid" would be the better word.

Why thank you, Republic. No more than I would expect from someone from your nation.

Or maybe it's just that the managers of the various companies find Beck distasteful, as well, and simply don't want their organizations associated with Beck. We can grant those managers, those who make decisions and especially decisions about company public relations, some intelligence and taste. It took Color of Change to get their attention, is all. Now those in charge of company/product image don't want to be seen as supporting Beck, and the stampede is on.

There ARE consequences attached to ones deeds. Words DO have meaning. There can be accountability, no matter how much the right-wing asserts what none of this applies to them. Kind of spoils the "I'm the Man" buzz, don't it? Sucks to have to think before you speak, don't it? Awwwww, breaks my liberal heart.

boycotts never work.
the right is boycotting disney.. cbs.. letterman. ophrah and about a dozen others..
this is working cause people have already died due to glen becks mouth.
this is working cause he has zero integrity.
this is workign cause obamas was raised in a lifestyle that used to be reserved for whites.
How much you want to be most of his friends at yale were white?
he dated a white girl there you know.

but most importantly his mother is white and glenn beck ois basically saying obama HATES his mother.

And sorry but that is a bit too far and the corps agreee.

hey we boycott rush all the time..this is working cause glenn cry baby beck is going too @!$%#ing far.

you knwo the guy that shot the three cops in pa.. did so cause beck told him obama would take his guns away.Obama on the other hand just signed a law allowing yall to take guns into parks.

you knwo the lady busted with guns that was going to single handily attack the national guard base?

IT IS CAUSE GLEN BECK TOLD HER IT WAS A FEMA CAMP.

Corps dont want theri name associated with this kind of baiting.
glen beck is trying to get obama killed.
and coprs are wise enough to not want to be part of that.

If you can not put the words of the guy you are sponcering on your own website next to your company name.. YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS SPONSORING THEM

and sorry it's not gov strong arming.. it is the american public strong arming who are sick of this @!$%#.

as for the reich comment

"if construction jobs go mainly to white males who already dominate the construction trades, many people who need jobs the most -- women, minorities, and the poor and long-term unemployed -- will be shut out."
you do know that in this post racist nation.. blacks have double the unemployement from the recession that whites do..

it might have been said better.. but you no so great greg are a @!$%#ing liar.. he never said what you say he said.

but I question the rapidity with which his advertisers are leaving him

Perhaps those companies got the message from the people via emails, and telephone calls and 'blogs'...on top of this organized boycott by ColorofChange...things do happen quicker now and there are a lot of people willing to send 'emails'...and make telephone calls... it doesn't take too long for a 'responsive' company to become 'aware' of an issue.

things do happen quicker now and there are a lot of people willing to send 'emails'.

Of course, dc, you're right. I do it quite often myself but, like writing to my Congressman, I seldom expect anything in response - other than the standard form letter.

It's natural for any responsible company leader to pull advertising dollars away from even the hint of a controversy like this, it only makes financial sense - they would certainly feel no special loyalty to Beck, either.

Thank man for the internet, eh? The great equalizer.

I agree with pjwrites, it sounds more like Government Strong Arming again!!!! Just like the Town Hall Meeting that Obama took part in. 1500 tickets, but only 600 given to real citizens of the community. What happened to the other 900? Seems they ended up in the hands of organized Obama supporters that weren't even from that area! Then who shows up? The SEIU or whatever their name is, and strong armed the citizens that were there for a peaceful protest. Since, the other tickets that should have been available....were not. These were both Republican and Democrats that were pushed out and unable to attend. You guys better wake up and research who you're really following into the snake pit.

Joules beef,

it might have been said better.. but you no so great greg are a @!$%#ing liar..

You listened to a doctored up tape, he said we are giving jobs to the minorities and not the White male construction worker, it was on the news channels

blacks have double the unemployement from the recession that whites do..

I don't have those facts, but maybe Affirmative Action has something to do with it. According to the law a corporation has to have so many blacks in proportion to whites whether they qualify for the job or not, so use your head, a recession comes and the first one's let off are going to be the ones without the skills. So you figure it out..

but you no so great greg are a @!$%#ing liar

adios mojon

Great Greg,

Regarding JoulesBeef’s comment 8.6 and others. Despite his COH violation of “but you no so great greg are a @!$%#ing liar.. (sic)” you should completely ignore his comments. I am not sure how he continually gets away with the violations, but I surmise it is because his statements are almost unintelligible.

This guy is a liberal troll personified. He shows up constantly and this is more worthless trash talk from the undereducated master of hate. It is one of his customary bizarre rants comprised of nonsensical comments, misspelled words, missing capitalization and punctuation, incomplete sentences and obscenities. You can be assured that in any seed his comments will surely make him the “Lout of the Day.”

What do you want to bet that all the folks who decry this boycott, especially Mother, were right on board when the religious right launched a boycott against Disneyworld some years back?

what on Earth does the government have to do with this? these advertisers are getting complaints for normal everyday citizens like you and I. as far as I know, no member of government has even spoken about this. just when you think you've hit the bottom of right wing delusion..........

Leo Katz, your comments are very true.

Leo Katz,

Regarding JoulesBeef’s comment 8.6 and others. Despite his COH violation of “but you no so great greg are a @!$%#ing liar.. (sic)” you should completely ignore his comments. I am not sure how he continually gets away with the violations

Simple. He gets away with COH violations because he's black and he and some Viners believe blacks aren't racist, that they are poor abused stepped on citizens, which he uses to his benefit, but he's not very good at it.

Complete bull@!$%#, G Greg.

If Joules gets away with anything, it's because 'viners don't report him. It has nothing to do with the color of his skin. If anyone is making racist comments here, that would be you, with that bull@!$%# statement above.

Fail.

pj,

BS

LDS is the LSD of religion.

They would probably say what I say: abolish the Fed, the banking cartel. and corporate personhood - and all will be well again.

Well said pj.

BTW... I agree COMPLETELY w/ abolishing "corporate personhood".

I think you're 100% right on that one.

I'm a little surprised righties don't jump on that one too, seeing as it's such a blatant distortion of what human rights are supposed to mean.

What say you, righties?

abolish the fed is a libertarian thing.
the purpose of the fed was that we were getting to political with the raising and lowering of rates.
and we would put people in those positions that had no training. Thats not to say we shouldnt get rid of the fed

abolish corp personhood should have been done long ago.

rightes like corp personhood

There ARE consequences attached to ones deeds. Words DO have meaning. There can be accountability, no matter how much the right-wing asserts what none of this applies to them. Kind of spoils the "I'm the Man" buzz, don't it? Sucks to have to think before you speak, don't it? Awwwww, breaks my liberal heart.

PDeuth is exactly correct and for Beck to be considered a credible and serious journalist on issues be it American politics or otherwise, he needs to endorse respectful debate. That is not what he does. He uses theatrics and spiteful, malicious words. Do people really not get that he is a "ratings" actor for Fox news and that all is for the dollars ($) that end up with the Australian, Murdoch, who owns the network. Rag TV.

Pdeuth:

So I guess Glenn Beck was against the insurance companies before he was for them. Wasn't it just this past year when Glenn Beck was getting a hemoroidectomy that he was screaming about how bad our health insurances are and now he says we have the greatest health care in the world. Must be very confusing for his base.

Being against something then for it or for it and then against - very GOP of him.

Gee... could all of this be "the invisible hand of the free marketplace" at work?

Funny how conservatives are always SOOOOOO for this, until it turns around and slaps them across the face.

Republic of Stupidity,

Obama "condoned it."

Reich was his Economic Adviser and Obama didn't condemn what he said which means he condones it. But African Americans can get away with being racist.. because Liberal Americans are turning into wusses...

Ge... by your logic, then I guess Bush condoned the thousands of the truly ugly comments made by right wing commentators during his two terms in the WH, because he never once condemned all that insane, hateful rhetoric, huh?

Or is he not responsible?

Good for the goose?

he doesnt..
greg lies a lot
he didnt even say that no money would go for whtie construction workers.
he said he didnt want all the jobs that were created to be given to the newly out of work white folks.. when the economy is @!$%#ing on minorities.
blacks are suffering from the recession more than whites.. they have been laid off in greater numbers and have a UE rate at twice whites.

the man could have spoken better.. but in no way was he saying money would only go to blacks.
HE SAID HE DIDNT WANT ALL THE MONEY TO GO TO WHITES.
totally different statement.

of course the logic impaired right cant see the dfference between those two statements,.

Republic-
"Bush condoned... comments made by right wing commentators..."

If you can see the difference between "commentators" and Obama's
"Economic Adviser", then you get the LACK of comparison. The
"Economic Advisor" is part of Obamination's ADMIN, not a simple
"news talking head".

If you don't see the difference, it's WON'T see, not CAN'T.
Nice try, though.

Rupublic of Stupidity,

by your logic, then I guess Bush condoned the thousands of the truly ugly comments made by right wing commentators

There is a difference between commentators and people Appointed by the President.

Can I make it any clearer..

Good for the goose?

If I were you I'd cook that Goose.

Dick Cheney:

"SO?"

You're funny... but not in a good way.

Got anything besides silly, re-heated, over-the-top hyperbole?

Got anything besides silly, re-heated, over-the-top hyperbole?

Nope. At least he (may have) used his own words this time. (Not like the "100 reasons to hate Obama's health care reform" article.)

"over-the-top hyperbole"

Why, YES! I have the cheesey liberal excuse for "news" that only has
the cheesey liberal point of view, EVER. It's understandable that
Beck tends to promote HIS view, (or that of the RNC god-heads)
since it is HIS show, and it is to be expected that ALL the cheese-
covered Lefties DEMAND he be put to sleep, ala "Don Imus", for his
"RIGHT" in expressing his opinion. Beck didn't say a THING about
Obama being a "Nappy-headed Ho", did he?

BTW- "Hyperbole" infers exaggeration. Did I exaggerate?

Why is it if Americans have a "RIGHT", the "Left" wants it removed,
stomped on, or otherwise silenced?

Also, it was "50" good reasons not 100.

Also, it was "50" good reasons not 100

And 100% plagiarized. It was took down so quick, I forgot the title. Thanks for confirming my suspicions. LMAO

I really wish yall would learn our Constitution.
ARTicle one is not in the bill of rights and details congressional power and setup.
amendment 1.
which entails the freedom of speech.. simply means obama will not kick beck off the airwaves.
Fox is allowed to.. and we are allowed to bitch until fox does.

Seriously will yall please at least if nothing else.. learn what the @!$%# "free speech" means
Fox is a private business and can fire beck for saying he likes dems if they want to.

Yes, sadly JB, there are many who do not understand the different nuance's of 'Free Speech' is only for 'public speech about the government' not 'private speech'...and even that can be 'curtailed' using public safety as an excuse...think 'yelling fire in a theater'...you can not do it with out repercussions...

Now, Glen Beck is on 'the air waves' to a certain extent it is 'public' but truly that platform is provided by a 'private company' and thus can be 'controlled'...

Seriously, think about it, anyone ever have a job where the employer says you cannot speak with the media about the company, or look at certain websites while at work, or make personal telephone calls on the job?...These are all things that people assume to fall under 'free speech', but these companies can make those rules because it is 'private' and thus controllable via that amendment...

That is why even here on NV, we may view these articles and comments publically, but it is a private company and therefore they can make and enforce 'controls' on speech...

trm2008-
"100% plagiarized"

Plagiarize-
"use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author
and the representation of them as one's own original work"

The very definition of the word "plagiarized" limits it's own definition
to "AN" author. Having both saved the ENTIRE article, AND using Tyler's
(administrator/moderator) admonitions as a backdrop against which to
allow or deny, the entire article was "researched", and quoted from
multiple sources. I offered to SHOW the links, about 10 of them.

I began with the disclaimer that LITTLE of the presentation was "mine",
and that ALL was a "compilation" of what I had read and discerned was
important. That it was ALL incorrect wasn't apparent until some actual
PEOPLE singled out (point by point) it's inherent errors.

It was left to ME to decide whether to discard, and in the interests
of PEACE on the Vine, I deleted the article MYSELF, rather than have
to read the 1000 pages of CRAP even Congress hasn't read, in order to
provide a better article.

In this case, YOU say "plagiarized", I say "researched". I have NO
problem admitting when I am incorrect. For instance, when I say
"Article 1", rather than "First Amendment", making an opening for
a half-assed statement "correcting" that simple gaffe. It allows for
EVERY half-assed armchair critic to "critique".

Ain't America great?

You researched, then cut and pasted all 50 reasons verbatim from another author while claiming credit for it. It was not " incorrect", it was dishonest.

"cut and pasted all 50 reasons"

Cut and pasted what I felt where the "best" 50 reasons from 10
different lists across the internet. Had I taken ONE person's
entire list, THAT would be plagiarized. Which is why Tyler didn't
just strike it down w/o parley.

Besides the FACT that YOU aren't a moderator, and the actual
person I answered to DID NOT DELETE the article, but left it to
MY discretion to do so or NOT. (Feel free to ask Tyler)

I actually considered LEAVING it up, so as NOT to lose the comments,
although some were as ignorant as yours, the biggest part of them
showed EXACTLY why they shouldn't be considered as FACT, in that
they were answered in a POINT-BY-POINT comparison TO the crappy
thousand-page piece of legislative toilet paper.

While I don't specifically remember YOUR "contribution", I have no
DOUBT it didn't include anything like an opinion. Mostly, those who
made comments HAD opinions, and showed respect for ME, and themselves,
in responding as "citizens of the vine". (GOOD show!)

Ever heard of "grace" or "good humor", or "respect", or SELF-respect?
I don't personally give a DAMN what your "position" is, you seem to
lack the essentials. Luckily, I don't take ANY of this crap "personally".

So, you have a GREAT day, poohbutt!

I looked at all fifty reasons before I reported it as plagiarism. I was the first comment and included a link to the original article. This is not my opinion, it is fact. I hope you have learned how easy it is to catch wanton plagiarism. It won't fly here on newsvine. The internet is a wonderful thing, isn't it?

Enough off topic commentary. My apologies Killfile.

In a sane country Glenn Beck's show would be broadcast as a Saturday morning kid's show, along with Bugs Bunny and the rest of the cartoon characters. The kids would know better than to take' Glenn the assclown'

Glenn Beck VS Amos and Andy.

Glenn Beck and Pee Wee Herman - pretty much the same mentality

Glenn Beck is a good reason for keeping censorship. You are censored here on the Vine. You are censored in polite company (it's called common sense). All TV is censored unless it is a pay channel and even some pay channels are censored.

So to that respect - sure there is free speech and then there is responsible free speech.

Did anyone see Glenn Beck and his Hitler tree segment? Even his guests thought Beck was off his rocker. Each time Glenn asked if they agreed with him, they all looked like they wished they were any where else but there and NO one agreed with him.

If you cant put the mans words next to your own logo.. you should sponser him.

as for rating big @!$%#ign @!$%#... a brutal and bloody car crash will ahve everyone slowing down their cars and gawking.. doesnt mean i want to sponser car crashes.

they didnt miscalculate.. fox miscalculated if they think ratings is all that maters.

You know you charge ad rates based on ratings.
but the people who normally would buy those ads have ran.
now when the ad contracts are up.. fox is going to have to reduce his ad prices.. to that of a much poorly rated show.

howard stern is popular/.. think all right wing instittutes must advert on his show?
disney is mega popular and yet the right boycott them
It really doesnt matter how popular you are..
if you can put his speach next to your companies name.. then you have no business advertising with him.

Interesting that Fauxheads always like to provide ratings as an extremely weak case for winning a "truth war", as it were. If one million people do a stupid thing, it is yet still..a stupid thing. And the lazy and misinformed usually fall in line with the masses rather than think for themselves, so those numbers mean nothing.

it tells me that there 3 million as*hole watch tv.

What it means is that MSNBC needs to be included in basic cable service. Why should third-place CNN be included but not second-place MSNBC - is that the American way? Oh, but thanks for bringing the matter to everybody's attention. Just keep copying and pasting those numbers (please).

night pundit

I always remember the classic just about every parent has used.

If fill in the blank jumped off a bridge would you.

If yours is the only "News Outlet" in town repeatedly catering to the bias of the right wing, it is fairly easy to corral almost all of the far right extremists into your fold...

Try comparing Fox's numbers to total viewership numbers across all media outlets, and the resultant ratios look strangely familiar...

I guess the (70+%) "rest of the world" just likes to use varied and less biased sources of information...

Nope. all of you are wrong. The numbers tell the story - people are waking up to who this President is and the people he surrounds himself with. I don't usually watch Glen Beck, but I have this week, not becasue I am a rasict ( which by the way is anyone who doesn't agree with you) but because I want to know who the crap these 43 czars are who are working outside the Constitiution and any Congressional oversight.

He has given facts and sources. It is quite interesting to know who these people are and how some of them don't care for our system of government. In the case of one or two - they are self proclaimed and avowed communists. One has to wonder why they are in the upper echelons of our government and appointed there by our President.

It claims its beating the socks off MSNBC and CNN and all those other liberal networks.

This wasn't from FOX, tooting it's own horn, but it was the Nielsen ratings from Monday. Must be hard to swallow for all you Chris, the Tingle, Matthews lovers , but it is what it is - you'll just have to deal with it!

I think you were writing while I was posting this, so here's an edit of 15.7 for you...

If yours is the only "News Outlet" in town repeatedly catering to the bias of the right wing, it is fairly easy to corral almost all of the far right extremists into your fold...

Try comparing Fox's numbers to total viewership numbers across all (news) media outlets, and the resultant ratios look strangely familiar...(with Fox's total viewership when compared to all viewers very closely resembling that percentage of the Nation's politically active that still self-identifies as "Republican".)

I guess the (70+%) "rest of the world" just likes to use (more) varied and less biased sources of information...

I added the parts in parentheses...

No one cares that Fox wins a ratings war in a fractured field of competitors, most here on Newsvine are not mathematically challenged at all. We can still see the big picture very clearly, in spite of all of that type of meaningless rethoric...

Is any one buying gold from the convicted felon / ex-con that advertises on Beck?

Just wondering

Many people are very proud of their racism. They treat it like religion: it is sacred and you should not question their beliefs. Their racism is sanctioned by blonde-hair, blue-eyed Jesus and you better recognize that.

I disagree with them.

JESUS has never been blonde, blue eye he was a jew...

d.b.

Careful - there are blond and blue eyed Jews.

JESUS has never been blonde, blue eye he was a jew...

Can you prove that?

Yes. Anyone can be a Jew, if they go through a process and are accepted into the community. Then...the children of the mother are automatically Jewish, too.

"racist defenders in this thread"

Can you show me an instance? Of "racism", I mean? Is it "racism"
because anyone who says ANYTHING against "The One" must BE racist?
Or "mental"? Or a "Republican"?

"obviously very in the wrong" is an o-pin-ion. Yours. NOT Beck's,
obviously, and not for a MULTITUDE of others who won't accept the
job of Presidential cheerleader, bootlick, or toady. YOU know,
anyone that can SEE, your Emperor has no CLOTHES.

Once again, the issue is NOT whether the POTUS who would be "God"
stands, himself, against the very fabric of the Constitution, but
rather that ANYONE who dares to speak against him MUST be "racist".

Blatant bull@!$%#.

DTansy-That is YOUR opinion. It is not fact either, even if you believe the drivel you just posted.

Can you show me an instance? Of "racism", I mean?

trm2008- No yap-yap on an "instance of racism"? Just ONE?

JoulesBeef- same question, since "racism" was YOUR comment?

Killfile, I want to make clear that I was speaking of this day and age, and actually about Reform Judaism, I failed to put that in #16.6 post.

And OOPS--Now I see my post doesn't even fit in that exchange. You were kind to not delete it as no value and give me a bad black mark from Newsvine. :-)

I think I must have misread "Jesus" for "Jews". Brain mis-fired...Sorry, everyone.

No way I believe Jesus was blonde and blue-eyed, though.

DTansy-You have no substantiation of your claims either, because it is your opinion. You really need to learn the difference.

Killfile

I remember seeing a documentary on Discovery about Nordic looking people mummfied in China.

The Takla Makan Mummies
The first Tocharian Nordic mummy found in 1989: a White female with long blond ... preserved 2,000-year-old Caucasoid mummy, discovered in 1995 in the region ...
http://www.meshrep.com/PicOfDay/mummies/mummies.htm

Lost White Settlements - China, Canary Islands
The first White mummy in the region was discovered by accident in 1977 after ... Above: Guanche mummies, with red hair and other Nordic features - the original ...
http://www.white-history.com/hwr6a.htm

A meeting of civilisations: The mystery of China's celtic mummies
The Uyghur American Association (UAA) works to promote the preservation and flourishing of a rich, humanistic and ... The Loulan Beauty's features are Nordic. ... Caucasian mummy discovered in 1995. ...
http://uyghuramerican.org/articles/471/1/A-meeting-of-civilisations-The-mystery-of-Chinas-...

Aryans: Culture Bearers to China
... the arid climate in the area, the mummies give evidence of a Nordic people with ... style decorations have been discovered from Europe, through Iran, to China. ...
http://library.flawlesslogic.com/china.htm

Since this is a reality - and these nordic people lived over 3,000 years ago - it is not so far fetched to believe there were blond and blue eye people walking around in Jerusalem during the time of Jesus.

trm2008-
"no substantiation..."

If "I said it myself", as you pointed out earlier, THAT
would be an "opinion". I don't care about verifying the
"Obama against the fabric of the Constitution" remark.

I simply ask ONE question, and you have twice skipped
around it.

The question was,

"an "instance of racism"? Just ONE?"

Killfile:

I see you are gleaning stories of the bible where I was talking from scientific discoveries. Since there are no descriptions of Mary or Jesus or even David and no pictures, assumptions can not be made - Not all Jews have big noses, not all Jews have curly black hair, not all Jews have brown eyes. How can you know what David looked like? The only person I remember having hair described in the bible was Samson - I could be mistaken.

and these nordic people lived over 3,000 years ago - it is not so far fetched to believe there were blond and blue eye people walking around in Jerusalem during the time of Jesus.

Of course there were blond blue eyed people, most of Ancient Rome (cradle of civilization) were Caucasians before mixing , same with what is western Europe today.

The Romans of ancient times looked like Italians and Greeks today.

Not really, towards the end of the empire there has been a bit of mixing, but not as much since the fall of Rome.

Look at the busts of Julius Caeser, Augustus , Cicero. Although some had some Alpo Dinaric ( Mediterranean) features there was also some Keltic Nordic in there as well.

Rome was basically like the US is today a melting pot.

ProfChaos-

I don't know about "proves", but,

Was Beck suspended?

funny I didn't know he was suspended either. Killfile, you got a source?

Killfile:

Maybe investigating Beck's vacation time last year and compare to the timing this year might help determine if he was on vacation or if he was suspended.

Neither Fox nor Beck is going to admit to suspension and while I suppose it could have been a vacation it was awfully strange timing.

Fox would totally throw beck under the bus if it felt it was losing advertisers (kind of like the Imus situation). there is nothing to be gained by not making it public and everything to be gained by making it public.

and is late august really an odd time to take a vacation?

Right. Liberals don't use logic, nor are we mathematically inclined, if you believe the Beck supporters.

No doubt Beck supporters would say the Dems cheated. For instance I've heard that Obama won because of Acorn and other such groups whose members voted twice and registered all those dead people. I was just told that TODAY as a matter of fact.

Ah yes..ACORN, felons who weren't allowed to vote, dead people, covert Nazi operatives trying to infiltrate the government through subterfuge. You have no idea how ridiculous some of the theorizing I've heard has become...

Yet they can't cite or link verifiable court cases where people from Acorn were found guilty nor that prove that there was mass whole scale cheating and vote rigging/tampering or double voting...Sure there were just a few questionable 'registration attempts' by some of the 'on the street persons' working for Acorn, but nothing more than that...

Though they all fall down blaming Acorn for everything anyway...All one of them has to do is say Acorn and the right comes running with the lies again and again...no proof, just lies and accusations.

Every time they start down that road, I say just a few simple words..."Prove it with legal sources"..."Link it so we can all see the proof"...they don't because they can't.

Everyone knows that the "liberal media" got Obama elected, even though no one watches them. LOL

Acorn Indicted for Voter Fraud

http://www.kmbc.com/politics/10214492/detail.html

http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=163905

http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124182750646102435.html

Just a few. There's MORE. Shall I continue?

I looked at the first link. Nice try. The employees were charged with voter registration fraud after they were turned in by ACORN. You really should read the whole article before you post the link. LOL I'm not going to waste anymore time with your links. Life is too short.

More and more people are going to Fox news now because they are finally realizing how they got screwed voting for Obamarama. Go Fox news, keep getting the truth out.

thanks trm, most people don't seem to understand the difference between 'voter registration fraud' vs 'voter fraud'...nor know the difference between 'indicted' and a 'conviction' (you will note my comment asked for proof of being found 'guilty as in convicted' of voter fraud, which hasn't been provided...)...

Most all those stories have been linked to various NV articles and debunked since the last election season...(a simple NV search will bring up 55 pages of links, so there are lots of hits)...

to me fraud is fraud...plain and simple, I don't distinguish between larceny and grand larceny - it is theft pure and simple. fraud is the same way.

vol fan

So one of the people you hired committed fraud to your company and within your company. You found out about it and turned them into the authorities.

Now are you guilty and should the authorities put your ass in jail?

"...to me fraud is fraud..."

Well, you should notice there is a difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud...

Voter registration fraud is filling out the 'form falsely'.

Voter fraud is actually attempting to vote at a polling place...usually with a false ID or at the wrong polling location...

Big difference...

vol fan,

to me fraud is fraud...plain and simple

Correct regardless of how it's packaged

I know. I am so happy, my portfolio has gone up at least that and more since he was elected...I am starting to buy stocks again...sure wish I had bought Ford back in Feb 09 though, it was at around .39 cents, now its over $7.00. Would have made a killing on that one...oh well.

Portfolio's would have com back anyway sooner or later it wasn't the "great Obama" that brought them back believe. He's a loser.

But yet Bushies gave Bush the credit back when the stock market got really artificially high, before it crashed. Remember that?

No that was just crooked rotten lousy CEO's. Thanks to Bush for not over taxing companies so they could keep going and keep hiring though. Obama wants to tax these same companies right out of the U.S. but then you can't expect anything else out of him, not too swift.

Ooooh..that's catchy. Dance Break!

Did you have a teleprompter for that little act?

Did you have a teleprompter for that little act?

Did you make that one up yourself?

ALL TOGETHER NOW, "Oh happy day / Oh happy day / Oh happy day / Oh happy day / When Jesus Washed / Glenn Beck away!"

But the drain drain was clogged/ With the Liberal lames..

Budoopy doop be doop eee doopy oooodayyyyyy!!!!!

What is it with conservatives and the religious right, always thinking they know what God wants? Religious nut cases.

This is exactly why we need to separate religion from government...{{{soul shuddering shakes}}}

Theocracy anyone?

This is exactly why we need to separate religion from government...{{{soul shuddering shakes}}}

Theocracy anyone?

No thanks! We got close enough under Baby Bush!

rig,

some Africans are light skin and have light eyes... The same can be said of Europeans... not all Europeans are the same...some have olive skin toned other are pale and others look red with freckles... there is no white or black... its that simple people...

You forgot to ad the Black people that are bluish black.

So "color" means all colors - hmmmm - must be that racist thing against all colors - good thing Casper the Ghost isn't around - he would be ostricized in this country because he has no color.

Color for Change means ALL colors. I like the color Purple.

I never noticed he was gone. When I was looking through the t.v. guide the show was advertised, and when I turned through the channels I noticed his ugly mug on there several times.

If he was suspended, why was his stupid show still running?

He's so popular, and even more so now. Anyone that says crazy things like he does will attract conservative right wingers like flies to poop.

Officially? Probably not. But I loved the timing of his "vacation"

AWM, Nope. It's a lie....at best typical wishful thinking posted as fact, aka leftist "journalism."

I don't believe he was, that's wishful thinking on the left and democrats, they are looking really bad and Glen Beck is bringing that out. Why do you suppose they want to get rid of talk radio and TV? They can't get by with crap.

Sure if you are taken in by phoney Obamarama and that group of tax cheating leftitst idiots he hired- you are going to say that. You folks are in for a very severe let down and the worse part of it we on the other side has to go with you, thanks for nothing.

You folks are in for a very severe let down and the worse part of it we on the other side has to go with you

not if we vote them out in 2010 and 2012....we need to vote out the corrupt congress and president & take back our gov...

the main reason beck brings out such fear and hatred by the left libbies is because he states the truths about how much the left libbies are destroying this country and how they are doing it.. beck is making the public aware of such destructiveness by the liberals..so they fear him..

I think he was being facetious. I could be wrong, but it just seemed...

rig,

There is no such thing as person being bluish black???? Maybe really dark... to appear as if they look bluish black... and that is only if one is simple and sees people according to color...

Wrong, and I believe they are black who haven't integrated with lighter races. You very rarely see them in the US, but outside there are many..

During the Viking days when the Vikings sailed down the African coast to trade they referred to the people there as the blue men.