Internet Users Are Asking: "Did Glenn Beck Rape and Murder a Young Girl in 1990," Post Cash Reward For Anyone Who Can Prove He Didn't

and the intent of my post was to be funny. Unfortunately I think I came off looking stupid or confused.

Possibly both and maybe a third option I haven't thought of yet.

Dang. :)

Are you sure your not mixing Glenn Beck with the famous Ted who left Mary jo in a submerged car till she ran out of air.

And Ted also recieved a hero's medal from Obama.

GROAN.

Let's not speak ill of the dead....

why not? he's perfectly fitting to speak ill of. murderer.

Iluvmyblog

As an independent, I'm concerned about this possible killing by Beck. All I want him to do is say where he was and what he was doing at the time. Is that too much to ask?

I think his silence on this is very suspicious. What could he be hiding??

azpaddy-

why would anybody even consider this to be true??? You can find anything on the internet, but alot of it is so bogus.

to answer your question Diedre, if you go to the libary and check out the book by Sal Alinsky, Mr. Beck has talked about , it will become chystal clear why these people do these smear jobs.

diedre

I don't know of anyone who knows the killing by Beck to be true, but why hasn't he come out in public and deny it?

That's all I'm saying. All he needs to do is explain where he was, and what he was doing at the time of the murder.

Till then, he sure seems guilty.....

We could have him waterboarded until he confesses.

My first thought was to wonder why on earth Killfile would think someone can prove a negative like this. But I've never listened to Beck, and after reading the comments it's apparently his style to do just this. So ... I think I will continue my ignorance and not listen to him.

The author of this thread is unnaturally "obsessed" with Glen Beck.....so Beck must be doing a great job!

Maybe the author of this thread should "Prove" that he is not "obsessed" with a popular TV personality! Otherwise, we can assume he most certainly is!
Yes, he is guilty alright of obsession.

evilgenius

THAT is a Capital idea!

We should all be obsessed with eradicating hate and lies aimed at our president.

When we find such we will help eradicate it. We should also obsess with eliminating liberal ignorance of facts on the ground in America.

"When we find such"? "Facts on the ground"?

You've been reading Gordon Liddy again, haven't you!

No, Saul Alinski.

Another newsvine oddity. The name Saul Alinski seems to only come up in right wing comments. Prior to joining Newsvine I rarely heard the name, and it seems the same few keep repeating it.

That, no doubt, has resulted in a few book sales for this once obscure author.

You don't need to read Alinsky's book yourself anymore. His subversion and revolution techniques are mainstream liberal tactics and strategies. You just didn't realize where they came from. I doubt you've read Mao's little read book or Mein Kampf either, but the left uses their methods in its day to day activities, too.

Drats! You've found us out, DonkeyRidder!

Once we had Mao's "little black book", we knew there must be more in his "little read (sic ) book", so we stole it! There, we were introduced to "Mein Kampf", which roughly translated means "My fake leg".

Mein Kampf ( once we learned to pronounce it without laughing ) was the place we found Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and that led us to Saul Alinsky, and he then led us to "the chosen one", as you have referred to him.

Thank God you've uncovered our secret. I can sleep now.

Only on Newsvine.

You got it! All books are little read books to liberals. A few internet postings and videos suffices for their education. Obama learned the kids a few things today.

AZPADDY - The name Saul Alinski seems to only come up in right wing comments.

So what are you suggesting...

...is it shame or ignorance that causes liberals to avoid mentioning one of their current playbooks?

What am I suggesting??

OK, I'll spell it out for you: Saul Alinsky is only mentioned regularly on Newsvine, ( and possibly other obscure right wing media outlets ). Mainstream media such as major dailys, T.V. networks, Radio, etc. rarely mention Alinsky's name.

OK? Do you understand that? In other words, right wingnuts here on newsvine seem to have an obsession with "Saul Alinsky". Nobody else anywhere seems to care who he is, and whatever it is you claim he was / is.

And this upsets you that so many you know or identify with have a more limited frame of reference....?

Usually, those who identify themselves as progressives or liberals tend to argue more from a posture of emotionalism rather than analytical rationality

It is no surprise that the majority are unable to cite the thinkers and philosophical arbiters who are seminal to their ideological underpinnings

Oh, I'm SO impressed with the George Will type of writing! Do you talk that way when ordering breakfast? George Will does.

Let's just cut out the B.S., OK? Very few outside of newsvine discuss Saul Alinsky because he'a a fringe player on the national political scene, if that. Not because people outside of newsvine are ignorant, as you imply.

The "majority" may seem less intelligent than you consider yourself, but I assure you, it's solely because the "majority" has no need to wear their knowledge of obscure political figures on their collective sleeves, emotionalism aside.

I hate when people complain about something, then do it themselves.

I hate when people complain about something, then do it themselves.

Then you might want to leave America. We collectively @!$%# our pants over socialism, then we started using many socialist systems, such as socialized police depts, roads, schools, fire depts, etc etc etc

I hate people who claim to hate something while they actively take part in it and don't realize that they are being hypocritical.

I hate when people complain about something, then do it themselves.

Since when has Glenn Beck ever said his show, and rants on said show, were satirical?

I hate when people defend the ahole when a satirical piece is use to expose him for the lying sack he is.

FL Independent
but beck doesnt come with a satire tag.
Drawing a charecture of someone IS NOT IMITATING THEM.

@Mat

Then you might want to leave America. We collectively @!$%# our pants over socialism, then we started using many socialist systems, such as socialized police depts, roads, schools, fire depts, etc etc etc

Right, because its always better to just run away then to stay and fight for something worth fighting for.

No we did not 'collectively @!$%# our pants over socialism'. We are not the people lived back then.

I hate people who claim to hate something while they actively take part in it and don't realize that they are being hypocritical.

I do too. Thats exactly what you are doing. You are trying to imply that I was doing it but you provided no evidence of it and really have no clue what I feel about such things, so your statement looks pretty foolish.

Spoken like a true Iranian 3rd world country oppressor. So you would rather follow 3rd world rules of law rather than American laws of innocent until proven guilty?

The burden of proof is on the accuser.....always in America.

Willing.Sniper wrote "....The burden of proof is on the accuser.....always in America."

Not really. The President had so many right wing nuts demanding proof of his birth certificate. I did not hear a peep of the fact that the accusers had to prove their case. au contraire the reverse was true.

Spoken like a true Iranian 3rd world country oppressor. So you would rather follow 3rd world rules of law rather than American laws of innocent until proven guilty?

The burden of proof is on the accuser.....always in America.

Congratulations. You just got the point of this little exercise. Now pass that wisdom onto Fox News and invite them to share this attitude with you.

Willing Sniper,

I'm glad you see things my way.

The burden of proof is on the accuser.....always in America.

In a court of law? Yes. In the court of public opinion??? Not so much, as this exercise demonstrates.

I'd rather have her represent Beck and stay far away from our cause. We can afford lawyers who don't need to clean teeth in their spare time.

Somebody didn't get the joke. Kudos!

Honest, I'm just a commentator anyone that believes me is just nuts.

the published information is false

As soon as he proves it is false he might have a case. Why is he denying some people have said this?

Line forms to the right for Defamation cases against Beck.

there must be somethign to this will all the noise about it.

Hint: The story illustrates the unfair way that Beck performs character assasination on his show.

It's a joke Dude.

When has he preformed a character assassination. If you consider character assassination bringing facts to light the yes that is what he does

When? Every minute of every day on his show he attempts character assassination on Obama and Acorn and every black person in Obama's administration. He did it when he called Obama a racist. Character assassination is Beck's whole shtick.

Again when is pointing out facts character assassination?

Where does he "point out facts" John?

WOW is that really all you got. come on you can do better than that. I guess you missed the part where he said I'm not accusing you

He points out facts on every show maybe you should watch the show I think it would be helpful you

Come on Killfile, thats dishonest how you posted that and you are guilty of the same twisting that you accuse Beck of. He didnt ask him to prove it. He explained how part of him feels like he would want to ask that but he didnt ask it. If he really felt that way, then he was being honest about it. Would you have preferred he lied about it?

Beck is plenty ridiculous with his blubbery fake crying and often fake outrage over things, but atleast deal with something real instead of twisting what he is saying. He says enough things that you can directly attack him for.

Those crazy left wing beckers at it again

THis article is about as funny as a pay toilet in a diarrhea war

geez, these people are desperate....

(He's no more a communist today than George Bush is a drunk).

Wait...so you're saying Van Jones IS a communist?

killfile, please answer post 19.14.... this is important.

THis article is about as funny as a pay toilet in a diarrhea war

That would actually be pretty freakin' funny to me - as long as I wasn't one of the combatants

Whew, thanks for that reply, Killfile. I knew you couldn't have gone to the dark side.

We can go with the continued campaign to paint Van Jones as a communist. (He's no more a communist today than George Bush is a drunk).

really, he isn't? has he renounced what he said about his earlier communist leanings?

here' s an excerpt from Wikepdia:

..."the incident deepened my disaffection with the system and accelerated my political radicalization."^[10] His outrage over the verdict radicalized him: Jones said he was "a rowdy nationalist"^[11] before the King verdict was announced. By August of that year, he said, "I was a communist."^[11] Jones's activism was also spurred on by witnessingracial inequality in New Haven: “I was seeing kids at Yale do drugs and talk about it openly, and have nothing happen to them or, if anything, get sent to rehab...And then I was seeing kids three blocks away, in the housing projects, doing the same drugs, in smaller amounts, go to prison.”^[9]

When he graduated law school, Jones gave up plans to take a job in Washington, D.C., and moved to San Francisco instead.^[11] He got involved with Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), a group explicitly committed to revolutionary Marxistpolitics^[12] whose points of unity were revolutionary democracy, revolutionary feminism, revolutionary internationalism, the central role of the working class, urban Marxism, and Third World Communism.^[13]

well... of course, we will NEVER know if he renounced ANY of that because he was an appointed a CZAR by Obama ( making how much in taxpayers dollars??) who is working outside the oversight of the Congress and any questioning by such.

what do you say to that? are you okay with this, killfile? These are his words and associations, not made up accusations, not just a "painting of him as a communist".

Careful, KF, quote facts to a hard-core conservative and you might damage something. Once their minds are set on something, they set like concrete... If you've got one of those, here, something could crack.

if you listen to the things van jones has said and you dont think hes a radical communist douche, you truly are blind.

To be honest, Killfile, nothing in there says he not a communist or that he denounced any of his previous positions or that its not his ultimate goal. This is just the current thing he is working on.

You act as if no one ever has ulterior motives or long term goals, that everyones intentions are always upfront and on the surface. Thats very naive, but I think its what you want to see because hes left leaning.

I have no idea if he is currently a communist or not. Anyone can say anything and will disavow anything, especially when confronted about things that they dont want people to know. But we couldnt find anyone with a less controversial past? Why do we even need these czars anyway? Why arent these things handling by the existing cabinets?

And you are playing a bit of politicis with this. If it was a Bush appointee with a controversial past, like if he was a former clansman, you wouldnt be giving him the benefit of the doubt like you are giving Jones.

Rainkiss - quote facts to a hard-core conservative and you might damage something. Once their minds are set on something, they set like concrete...

Is this belief written in stone in your mind ?

Is this belief written in stone in your mind ?

Nope, not at all. Show me a hard-core conservative willing to change a deep-seated conviction based on facts, and I'll happily adjust my thinking. I've just never seen it happen. Conservatives in general, sure, but the far-right wing who believe that giving women the right to vote was a pretty hinky idea? Not so much.

Now if there's a more shady background than "substance abuse problems" for for the guy who's gonna have launch authority on our nuclear weapons I don't know what it is but what's past is/was past and I was willing to take Bush at his word on that one.

But its also easier to spot someone who is drinking and lying about it then it is to spot someone who is lying about the way they think about things. If Bush was still drinking, people would see him drunk at times. Its not so obvious to see when they have ulterior motives and plans swirling in their heads.

I dont know this guy from a hole in the ground. But the things I have seen, from his own statements and actions, regardless of his political affiliation, show he is not really the type of person we should have in a position of authority. I would hope we could do better, but maybe we cant these days.

I agree you really should push it further. Maybe you should hook up with the boycott and take this story about beck to his current advertisers and also the ones that so called pulled ads. Maybe you guys could get keith olberman to bring it up on his show I heard he will broadcast lies on nearly anything. MSNBC just might issue you guys an infomercial for the right price I heard they could really use the money.

john, do you get the point of this story yet? The reason that so many advertisers pulled their ads is because Beck made up a bunch of stories like this whopper that is fabricated about him, and then he crossed the line by going way too far with his racist attacks on the President of the United States.

If you object to this story, you should object to Becks methods as well. That's the point.

What stories did beck fabricate?? I thought the reasons advertisers pulled ads was because he called obama a racist.. Did I miss something?

apparently logical reasoning

Still waiting on the fabricating?

they have nothing, john, but this and other piece of crap stories. You'll keep waiting..might as well move on to the next depserate attempt on Newsvine.

But I have to admit, this is even low for killfile.

Joe -- for some of the people on this seed and others I have seen on other forums

I'm surprised they are not deaf from the enormous Varrrooom right over their head.

You seem to be sitting at the table, want some mustard with you sandwich?

Nope not at the table, just observing Trolls slopping up their sh!t sandwich

observe ,to watch, not to take part

You seem to have taken at least 6 bites.

"We can go with the continued campaign to paint Van Jones as a communist. (He's no more a communist today than George Bush is a drunk)."

Sorry Kill, Van Jones is a self admitted communist. And did you catch the video accusing whites of poisoning the drinking water of the blacks with pollutants? Obviously in his mind whites are doing this on purpose and to specifically target blacks. Really? and what was is job title again, Green Job Czar? And how does he get this job with a Federal criminal record, when the general population is denied jobs for any kind of criminal record? But he remains , one of Obumas' Czars, when many of the general population would been terminated for this language and criminal record. Is this their idea of equality?

http://imgur.com/3qpo5.png

actual police report.

bull mmatm - this is a "satire", remember? Go get back in line and keep your mouth shut.

Prove that the report is fake.

Actually, I can prove it. I actually understand the difference between one's intelligence (which is 100% relative) and proving a document is fake. You don't understand this. So, you can not factually call me an idiot, since I have more basic understanding than you do.

Yeah the police report is fake. It's as fake as the Kenyan birth certificates used on Beck's show to slander Obama.

sorry killfile...sometimes I get too frustrated.

Want proof it is fake? Just look at my comment #27.2 on the next page.

sometimes I get too frustrated.

And your momma didn't teach you how to act. Grow up.

It's that gosh-awful "conservative media". Only the Onion has true facts.