Visit Killfile's column >>

KILLFILEHome Page

Epicurean Intelligentsia
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 305; Links Seeded: 7617
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/25/2009

Billions of dollars and a Nobel Prize later, it looks like 'microlending' doesn't actually do much to fight poverty

advertisement

In the world of international aid, microcredit is a rock star. The practice of giving very poor people very small loans to start very small businesses has been hailed as one of the very few unambiguous success stories in the long, frustrating fight against Third World poverty. The pioneer of the practice, Bangladesh's Grameen Bank, has disbursed more than $8 billion in unsecured loans, usually in amounts under $100, to people traditional banks ignore. Along with a 98 percent repayment rate, Grameen has accrued an inspiring collection of stories about its overwhelmingly female borrowers, whose microloans allowed them to start up an embroidery or pottery business, or a snack cart or a stand selling cell phone cards, and through such petty entrepreneurship lift themselves out of poverty. "Small Loans, Big Gains," a 2002 Globe editorial on microcredit was titled.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":10036955,"authorDomain":"killfile"}

Part of the problem is that if you're willing to cherry-pick your data you can "prove" anything. That's why its important to look at the data overall rather than the warm and fuzzy stories.

{"commentId":10036955,"threadId":"699934","contentId":"3375803","authorDomain":"killfile"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:31 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"699934","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"699934","contentId":"3375803"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking